Vargas v. CML Security, LLC et al
Marcelino Vargas |
Yates/Sundt A Joint Venture, Memco, Inc. and CML Security, LLC |
5:2021cv00038 |
January 18, 2021 |
US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
Fred Biery |
Richard B Farrer |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 28 SCHEDULING ORDER, ( ADR Report Deadline due by 11/18/2021,, Amended Pleadings due by 10/8/2021,, Discovery due by 11/18/2021,, Joinder of Parties due by 10/8/2021,, Dispositive Motions due by 12/17/2021,). Signed by Judge Richard B. Farrer. (wg) |
Filing 27 CONFIDENTIALITY AND PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Richard B. Farrer. (wg) |
Notice of Correction: Notice was changed to a Motion (Event & Text) re #20 MOTION. (wg) |
Filing 26 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Richard B. Farrer: Pretrial Conference held on 3/4/2021 (Minute entry documents are not available electronically.). (Court Reporter FTR-Gold.)(wg) |
Filing 25 DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE to Motion, filed by Yates/Sundt A Joint Venture, re #24 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Plaintiff Marcelino Vargas (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Denying Plaintiff's Motion to Remand Removed Action)(O'Rourke, Stephanie) |
Filing 24 MOTION to Remand to State Court by Marcelino Vargas. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A). Motions referred to Judge Richard B. Farrer. (Westlund, R.) |
Filing 23 ORDER RESETTING, ( Pretrial Conference Re-set for 3/4/2021 10:00 AM before Judge Richard B. Farrer,). Signed by Judge Richard B. Farrer. (wg) |
Filing 22 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Laura A. Wright on behalf of CML Security, LLC. Attorney Laura A. Wright added to party CML Security, LLC(pty:dft) (Wright, Laura) |
Filing 21 Unopposed MOTION to Continue of the Initial Pre-Trial Conference by Yates/Sundt A Joint Venture. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order). Motions referred to Judge Richard B. Farrer. (O'Rourke, Stephanie) |
Text Order GRANTING as unopposed #21 Motion to Continue. The Pretrial Conference currently set for February 11, 2021 at 10:00 a.m. is hereby RESET to February 18, 2021 at 10:00 a.m. Entered by Judge Richard B. Farrer. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (lr) |
Reset Hearings: Pretrial Conference set for 2/18/2021 10:00 AM before Judge Richard B. Farrer, (wg) |
Filing 20 Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Notice of Removal by Yates/Sundt A Joint Venture (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(O'Rourke, Stephanie) Modified event & text on 3/9/2021 (wg). |
Filing 19 Amended NOTICE of Removal by Yates/Sundt A Joint Venture re #1 Notice of Removal,, filed by Yates/Sundt A Joint Venture.(wg) |
Filing 18 Joint Proposed Scheduling Order by Yates/Sundt A Joint Venture. (O'Rourke, Stephanie) |
Filing 17 NOTICE Joint Discovery/Case Management Plan by Yates/Sundt A Joint Venture (O'Rourke, Stephanie) |
Filing 16 Original ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by CML Security, LLC.(Balido, Carlos) |
Filing 15 Original ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by CML Security, LLC.(Balido, Carlos) |
Text Order GRANTING #10 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. It is this Court's policy to require all counsel to apply for admission to the Western District's federal bar and to follow through with the application as a condition of appearance pro hac vice in any case. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, if counsel appearing pro hac vice has not already done so, counsel shall promptly submit an application to be admitted to practice in the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas in the manner set forth in the Local Rules. The Court further ORDERS that counsel become familiar with the Local Court Rules of the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, a copy of which may be obtained from the United States District Clerk for the Western District of Texas or from the Court's website. If not already done, counsel appearing pro hac vice must immediately tender the amount of $100 to the Clerk of the Court, payable to: Clerk, U.S. District Court, in compliance with Local Rule AT-1(f)(2). Finally, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that counsel appearing pro hac vice, pursuant to Section 6 of the Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing in Civil and Criminal Cases in the Western District of Texas, must register as a filing user within ten (10) days of this Order. Entered by Judge Richard B. Farrer. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (rmag) |
Text Order GRANTING #4 Motion for Leave to File as unopposed. See Local Rule CV-7(e)(2). Entered by Judge Richard B. Farrer. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (rmag) |
Filing 14 STIPULATION of Dismissal Joint Stipulation of Dismissal by Yates/Sundt A Joint Venture. (O'Rourke, Stephanie) |
Filing 13 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Carlos A. Balido on behalf of CML Security, LLC. Attorney Carlos A. Balido added to party CML Security, LLC(pty:dft) (Balido, Carlos) |
Filing 12 ORDER REGARDING PRETRIAL MATTERS AND PENDING MOTIONS, ( Scheduling Recommendations/Proposed Scheduling Order due by 2/8/2021,, Initial Pretrial Conference set for 2/11/2021 10:00 AM before Judge Richard B. Farrer,). Signed by Judge Richard B. Farrer. (wg) |
Filing 11 Pro Hac Vice Fee Paid by Dana M. Gannon; Filing fee $ 100, receipt number 500056703. (wg) |
Filing 10 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Dana M. Gannon by on behalf of Memco, Inc... Motions referred to Judge Richard B. Farrer. (wg) |
Filing 9 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Richard B. Farrer. Signed by Judge Fred Biery.. Referral Magistrate Judge: Richard B. Farrer. (wg) |
Filing 8 COURT ADVISORY CONCERNING DISCOVERY. Signed by Judge Fred Biery. (wg) |
Filing 7 Order for Scheduling Recommendations/Proposed Scheduling Order. Scheduling recommendations/proposed scheduling order due to the Court within sixty (60) days from the date of this Order., Notice of right to consent to disposition of a civil case by a U.S. Magistrate Judge. Signed by Judge Fred Biery. (wg) |
Filing 6 Proposed Order, #4 Motion for Leave to File Amended Notice of Removal by Yates/Sundt A Joint Venture. (O'Rourke, Stephanie) Modified text on 1/20/2021 (wg). |
Filing 5 NOTICE First Amended Notice of Removal by Yates/Sundt A Joint Venture re #1 Notice of Removal, (O'Rourke, Stephanie) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to File First Amended Notice of Removal by Yates/Sundt A Joint Venture. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(O'Rourke, Stephanie) |
Filing 3 Letter sent to attorney Dana M. Gannon regarding admission into the Western District of Texas. (cd) |
Case assigned to Judge Fred Biery. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (cd) |
If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Farrer (cd) |
Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Parties by Yates/Sundt A Joint Venture. (O'Rourke, Stephanie) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Yates/Sundt A Joint Venture (Filing fee $402 receipt number 0542-14386737), filed by Yates/Sundt A Joint Venture. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J-1, #11 Exhibit J-2, #12 Exhibit K, #13 Exhibit L)(O'Rourke, Stephanie) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.