Mullins v. DPAC Acceptance, Ltd.
Plaintiff: Deborah Mullins
Defendant: DPAC Acceptance, Ltd. doing business as CNAC
Case Number: 5:2021cv00329
Filed: April 2, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Texas
Nature of Suit: Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA)
Cause of Action: 47 U.S.C. ยง 227
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 2, 2021 Filing 2 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Mohammed O. Badwan on behalf of Deborah Mullins (Badwan, Mohammed)
April 2, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0542-14656862), filed by Deborah Mullins. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Badwan, Mohammed)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mullins v. DPAC Acceptance, Ltd.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DPAC Acceptance, Ltd. doing business as CNAC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Deborah Mullins
Represented By: Mohammed O. Badwan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?