EP Loya Group, LP, et al v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London
| Loya Casualty Insurance Company, EP Loya Group, LP and Fred Loya Insurance Company |
| Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London |
| 5:2021cv00611 |
| June 28, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Richard B Farrer |
| Jason K Pulliam |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 6, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re #12 Motion to Dismiss filed by Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London. Signed by Judge Jason K. Pulliam. (mgr)
|
|
Filing 15
REPLY to Response to Motion, filed by Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London, re #12 MOTION to Dismiss or Stay Litigation filed by Defendant Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London (Khambatta, Daisy)
|
|
Filing 14
Response in Opposition to Motion, filed by EP Loya Group, LP, Fred Loya Insurance Company, Loya Casualty Insurance Company, re #12 MOTION to Dismiss or Stay Litigation filed by Defendant Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Ronald D. Getchey)(Getchey, Ronald)
|
|
Filing 13
RULE 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London. (Khambatta, Daisy)
|
|
Filing 12
MOTION to Dismiss or Stay Litigation by Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Affidavit & Exhibits A-E)(Khambatta, Daisy)
|
|
Filing 11
SUMMONS Returned Executed by EP Loya Group, LP, Loya Casualty Insurance Company, Fred Loya Insurance Company. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London served on 7/19/2021, answer due 8/9/2021. (Getchey, Ronald) Modified on 7/23/2021 To edit text (bc).
|
|
Notice of Correction: ***NOTIFIED ALL PARTIES THAT THE ENTRY WAS MODIFIED TO CORRECT THE TITLE, SERVICE DATE, AND ANSWER DUE DATE.*** re #11 Certificate of Service. (bc)
|
|
Filing 10
DEMAND for Trial by Jury by EP Loya Group, LP, Fred Loya Insurance Company, Loya Casualty Insurance Company. (Getchey, Ronald)
|
|
Filing 9
AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants amending, filed by EP Loya Group, LP, Loya Casualty Insurance Company, Fred Loya Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Cottrell, Amanda)
|
|
Filing 8
MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Amanda L. Cottrell of Charles Danaher ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-15008019) by on behalf of EP Loya Group, LP, Fred Loya Insurance Company, Loya Casualty Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Proposed Order). Motions referred to Judge Richard B. Farrer. (Cottrell, Amanda)
|
|
Filing 7
MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Amanda L. Cottrell of Ronald Getchey ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-15007917) by on behalf of EP Loya Group, LP, Fred Loya Insurance Company, Loya Casualty Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Proposed Order). Motions referred to Judge Richard B. Farrer. (Cottrell, Amanda)
|
|
Text Order GRANTING #8 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice It is this Court's policy to require all counsel to apply for admission to the Western Districts federal bar and to follow through with the application as a condition of appearance pro hac vice in any case. This Court, however, has made an exception for out-of-district counsel if their practice in the District is limited to one case and, in limited circumstances, a licensed Western District of Texas attorney is involved in the case as co-counsel. Here, a licensed Western District of Texas attorney has been designated as co-counsel. Therefore, counsel may appear in this case pro hac vice without seeking admission to practice in the Western District of Texas, although counsel is free to seek and is encouraged to seek admission if that is desired. Any future appearance in the Western District of Texas will require that counsel apply for admission and be admitted into this District, unless otherwise ordered by the Court. The Court further ORDERS that counsel must become familiar with the Local Court Rules of the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, a copy of which may be obtained from the United States District Clerk for the Western District of Texas or from the Courts website. Finally, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that counsel appearing pro hac vice, pursuant to Section 6 of the Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing in Civil and Criminal Cases in the Western District of Texas, must register as a filing user within ten (10) days of this Order. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (rmag)
|
|
Text Order GRANTING #7 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. It is this Court's policy to require all counsel to apply for admission to the Western Districts federal bar and to follow through with the application as a condition of appearance pro hac vice in any case. This Court, however, has made an exception for out-of-district counsel if their practice in the District is limited to one case and, in limited circumstances, a licensed Western District of Texas attorney is involved in the case as co-counsel. Here, a licensed Western District of Texas attorney has been designated as co-counsel. Therefore, counsel may appear in this case pro hac vice without seeking admission to practice in the Western District of Texas, although counsel is free to seek and is encouraged to seek admission if that is desired. Any future appearance in the Western District of Texas will require that counsel apply for admission and be admitted into this District, unless otherwise ordered by the Court. The Court further ORDERS that counsel must become familiar with the Local Court Rules of the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, a copy of which may be obtained from the United States District Clerk for the Western District of Texas or from the Courts website. Finally, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that counsel appearing pro hac vice, pursuant to Section 6 of the Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing in Civil and Criminal Cases in the Western District of Texas, must register as a filing user within ten (10) days of this Order. Entered by Judge Richard B. Farrer. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (rmag)
|
|
Filing 6
RULE 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by EP Loya Group, LP, Fred Loya Insurance Company, Loya Casualty Insurance Company. (Cottrell, Amanda)
|
|
Filing 5
RULE 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by EP Loya Group, LP, Fred Loya Insurance Company, Loya Casualty Insurance Company. (Cottrell, Amanda)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Richard B. Farrer. Signed by Judge Jason K. Pulliam. (mgr)
|
|
Filing 3
Summons Issued as to Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London. (bc)
|
|
Filing 2
REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by EP Loya Group, LP, Fred Loya Insurance Company, Loya Casualty Insurance Company. (Cottrell, Amanda)
|
|
Case assigned to Judge Jason K. Pulliam. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (rg)
|
|
If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Farrer. (rg)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0542-14959957). No Summons requested at this time, filed by EP Loya Group, LP, Loya Casualty Insurance Company, Fred Loya Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Cottrell, Amanda)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
