Harris v. Arteaga et al
Tommy R. Harris |
Lorraine Ann Arteaga, FNU Brewer and Assistant District Attorney |
5:2021cv00612 |
June 28, 2021 |
US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
Xavier Rodriguez |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Mailed Order (#11) and Judgment (#12) to Plaintiff's new address. (mgr) |
Filing 13 NOTICE of Change of Address by Tommy R. Harris (mgr) |
Filing 12 FINAL JUDGMENT-- IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff Tommy R. Harriss section 1983 claims against Defendant Assistant District Attorney, in his or her official capacity for monetary damages, are DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION based on sovereign immunity. See U.S. CONST. amend. XI. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff Tommy R. Harriss remaining section 1983 claims against Defendants are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE because the claims are barred by immunity or Plaintiff Tommy R. Harris has failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(i)(iii), 1915A(b)(1), (2). IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that the aboveentitled cause of action is hereby CLOSED. The Clerk of Court shall send a copy of this Final Judgment and the Order of Dismissal in this case to the keeper of the threestrikes list. Signed by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. (bc) |
Filing 11 ORDER OF DISMISSAL--IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED Harriss section 1983 claims against Defendant Assistant District Attorney, in his or her official capacity for monetary damages, (ECF No. 10) are DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION based on sovereign immunity. See U.S. CONST. amend. XI. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Harriss remaining section 1983 claims against Defendants (ECF No. 10) are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE because the claims are barred by immunity or Harris has failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Signed by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. (bc) |
Filing 10 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Lorraine Ann Arteaga, Assistant District Attorney, FNU Brewer amending #1 Complaint., filed by Tommy R. Harris.(mgr) |
Filing 9 ORDER GRANTING #8 Motion to Amend Complaint Signed by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. (mgr) |
Filing 8 MOTION to Amend Complaint by Tommy R. Harris. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Amended Complaint)(mgr) |
Filing 7 ORDER DISMISSING #6 Motion to Amend Order Signed by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. (mgr) |
Filing 6 MOTION to Amend Order by Tommy R. Harris. (mgr) |
Filing 5 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE--IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order, Harris must show cause why his Complaint should not be dismissed as frivolous or for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted by filing an amended complaint that cures the noteddeficiencies as to Tommy R. Harris.. Signed by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. (mgr) |
Mailed Order (doc #5) and 1983 Form to Plaintiff. (mgr) |
Filing 4 ORDER Directing Monthly Payments be made from Prison Account of TOMMY R. HARRIS, SID #319963. Signed by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. (bc) |
Mailed out Order #4 to the Bexar County Sheriff's Office to collect payment for filing fees (bc) |
Filing 3 Case Opening Letter to Tommy R. Harris. (nm) |
Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis by Tommy R. Harris. (nm) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT, filed by Tommy R. Harris. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Copy of Envelope)(nm) |
If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Farrer. (nm) |
THIS CASE HAS BEEN RANDOMLY ASSIGNED TO JUDGE XAVIER RODRIGUEZ. (nm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.