Kiewit Mining Group Inc. v. San Miguel Electric Cooperative, Inc.
Kiewit Mining Group Inc. |
San Miguel Electric Cooperative, Inc. |
5:2021cv00614 |
June 29, 2021 |
US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
Xavier Rodriguez |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Reset Deadlines: San Miguel Electric Cooperative, Inc. answer due 9/14/2021. (rg) |
Text Order GRANTING #5 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer entered by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. The deadline for Defendant to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint is hereby extended to September 14, 2021. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (cb) |
Filing 5 Agreed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer Stipulation and Agreed Motion Regarding Service and Extension of Time for Defendant to File Responsive Pleading by San Miguel Electric Cooperative, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Vanderhider, David) |
Notice of Correction: Please Disregard Order, Filed in Error :re #4 Order,, Set Deadlines/Hearings, Terminate Deadlines and Hearings. (wg) |
Filing 4 ***PLEASE DISREGARD, DOCUMENT ENTERED IN ERROR *****ORDER AND ADVISORY (Proposed Scheduling Order due by 7/30/2021) The parties are hereby ORDERED to notify the Court whether or not they consent toMagistrate Judge jurisdiction within thirty (30) days of the date of the filing of this Order. Signed by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. (rg) Modified on 7/12/2021 (wg). |
Text Order GRANTING #3 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted leave to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order. Entered by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (dc3) |
Text Order GRANTING #2 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted leave to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order. Entered by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (dc3) |
Filing 3 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Elliot Clark for Cody N. Schneider ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-14969179) by on behalf of Kiewit Mining Group Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order Granting Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission for Cody N. Schneider)(Clark, Elliot) |
Filing 2 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Elliot Clark for Mark C. Guthrie ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-14969153) by on behalf of Kiewit Mining Group Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order Granting Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission for Mark C. Guthrie)(Clark, Elliot) |
Case assigned to Judge Xavier Rodriguez. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (rg) |
If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Farrer. (rg) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0542-14963635). No Summons requested at this time, filed by Kiewit Mining Group Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Clark, Elliot) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.