Garcia v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Benjamin J. Garcia |
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company |
5:2021cv00631 |
July 6, 2021 |
US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
Elizabeth S Chestney |
Jason K Pulliam |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Vacation and Unavailability by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (Cowen, Sarah) |
Filing 5 AMENDED ANSWER to Defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company's First Amended Answer to Plaintiff's Second Amended Petition by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. (Cowen, Sarah) |
Filing 4 ORDER SETTING TELEPHONIC INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE (Initial Pretrial Conference set for 9/22/2021 2:00 PM before Judge Elizabeth S. Chestney,). Signed by Judge Elizabeth S. Chestney. (mgr) |
Filing 3 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Elizabeth S. Chestney. Signed by Judge Jason K. Pulliam. (mgr) |
Filing 2 ATTACHMENT Civil Cover Sheet to #1 Notice of Removal,,, by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Supplement to JS 44 Cover Sheet)(Cowen, Sarah) |
Case assigned to Judge Jason K. Pulliam. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (mgr) |
If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Chestney (mgr) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (Filing fee $402 receipt number 0542-14980707), filed by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Index State Court Documents, #2 Exhibit A-1 Plaintiff's Original Petition, #3 Exhibit A-2 Citation issued to Defendant, #4 Exhibit A-3 Affidavit of Service, #5 Exhibit A-4 Notice of Lead Counsel, #6 Exhibit A-5 Original Answer of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, #7 Exhibit A-6 Original Answer of State Farm County Mutual Insurance Company of Texas, #8 Exhibit A-7 Plaintiff's First Amended Petition, #9 Exhibit A-8 Plaintiff's Second Amended Petition, #10 Exhibit A-9 Defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company's Answer to Plaintiff's Second Amended Petition, #11 Exhibit B - Lis of All Counsel of Record and Parties Represented)(Cowen, Sarah) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Garcia v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Benjamin J. Garcia | |
Represented By: | Kyle Lynn Mathis |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company | |
Represented By: | Sarah Pierce Cowen |
Represented By: | Andrea Yvonne Vela |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.