Roberts v. Blackstar Fiber Company, LP
Toney Roberts |
Blackstar Fiber Company, LP |
5:2021cv00654 |
July 9, 2021 |
US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
Fred Biery |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 STIPULATION of Dismissal by Toney Roberts. (Sosa-Morris, Beatriz) |
CASE NO LONGER REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Richard B. Farrer. (wg) |
Filing 11 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Richard B. Farrer for pretrial proceedings including any requests for injunctive relief. Signed by Judge Fred Biery. (rg) |
Filing 10 ORDER FOR SCHEDULING RECOMMENDATIONS AND ADVISORY CONCERNING ASSIGNMENT OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE - the parties shall submit a proposed scheduling order to theCourt within thirty days of the date of this order as the defendant has already appeared. Signed by Judge Fred Biery. (rg) |
Filing 9 ORDER Court Advisory Concerning Discovery. Signed by Judge Fred Biery. (rg) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Paul M. Knettel on behalf of Blackstar Fiber Company, LP. Attorney Paul M. Knettel added to party Blackstar Fiber Company, LP(pty:dft) (Knettel, Paul) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Peter J. Stuhldreher on behalf of Blackstar Fiber Company, LP. Attorney Peter J. Stuhldreher added to party Blackstar Fiber Company, LP(pty:dft) (Stuhldreher, Peter) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Mark D. Temple on behalf of Blackstar Fiber Company, LP (Temple, Mark) |
Filing 5 RULE 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Blackstar Fiber Company, LP. (Temple, Mark) |
Filing 4 ANSWER to #1 Complaint . Attorney Mark D. Temple added to party Blackstar Fiber Company, LP(pty:dft) by Blackstar Fiber Company, LP.(Temple, Mark) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Blackstar Fiber Company, LP. (wg) |
Case assigned to Judge Fred Biery. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (wg) |
If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Farrer (wg) |
Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Toney Roberts. (Sosa-Morris, Beatriz) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0542-14995542). No Summons requested at this time, filed by Toney Roberts. (Attachments: #1 Errata Consent Form, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Sosa-Morris, Beatriz) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Roberts v. Blackstar Fiber Company, LP | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Toney Roberts | |
Represented By: | Beatriz A. Sosa-Morris |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Blackstar Fiber Company, LP | |
Represented By: | Mark D. Temple |
Represented By: | Paul M. Knettel |
Represented By: | Peter J. Stuhldreher |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.