Smith v. Matrix Minds, LLC et al
Plaintiff: Matthew A. Smith
Defendant: Matrix Minds, LLC, d/b/a Cloud 9 Vapo Shop, Carl Foote and Matrix Minds, LLC doing business as Cloud 9 Vapo Shop
Case Number: 5:2021cv00717
Filed: July 28, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Fred Biery
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 201
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Order for Scheduling Recommendations/Proposed Scheduling Order. In an effort to assist the parties in resolving this dispute as expeditiously and efficiently as possible, and in accordance with Rule CV-16(b) of the Local Court Rules of the Western District of Texas, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties shall submit a proposed scheduling order to the Court within 60 days after any defendant has appeared., Notice of right to consent to disposition of a civil case by a U.S. Magistrate Judge.. Signed by Judge Fred Biery. (mgr)
September 16, 2021 Filing 5 Defendant's ANSWER to #1 Complaint . Attorney Barry A. McClenahan added to party Matrix Minds, LLC(pty:dft) by Matrix Minds, LLC.(McClenahan, Barry)
July 28, 2021 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Carl Foote, Matrix Minds, LLC, d/b/a Cloud 9 Vapo Shop. (wg)
July 28, 2021 Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Matthew A. Smith. (Scalise, Charles)
July 28, 2021 Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Parties by Matthew A. Smith. (Scalise, Charles)
July 28, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0542-15058940). No Summons requested at this time, filed by Matthew A. Smith. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Scalise, Charles)
July 28, 2021 Case assigned to Judge Fred Biery. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (wg)
July 28, 2021 If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Bemporad (wg)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith v. Matrix Minds, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Matthew A. Smith
Represented By: Charles L. Scalise
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Matrix Minds, LLC, d/b/a Cloud 9 Vapo Shop
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carl Foote
Represented By: Barry A. McClenahan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Matrix Minds, LLC doing business as Cloud 9 Vapo Shop
Represented By: Barry A. McClenahan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?