Hernandez v. Gonzalez
| Samuel Hernandez |
| BCSO Deputy Juan Gonzales and Juan Gonzalez |
| 5:2021cv00773 |
| August 12, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Fred Biery |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 UMS-285 Form, Summons, Copy of the Complaint and Copy of the Order Granting IFP and Directing Service were sent to the USMS for service on Deputy Juan Gonzalez. (rg) |
| Filing 5 ADVISORY TO THE COURT by Samuel Hernandez. (rg) |
Filing 4
ORDER GRANTING IFP and DIRECTING SERVICE Directing Monthly Payments be made from Prison Account of SAMUEL HERNANDEZ. The Clerk of Court shall request the U.S. Marshal serve Defendant, Deputy Gonzales, with a summons and a copy of Plaintiffs Civil Rights Complaint (ECF No.1), by certified U.S. Mail return receipt requested. Signed by Judge Fred Biery. (rg)
|
| Filing 3 Case Opening Letter to Samuel Hernandez. (nm) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis by Samuel Hernandez. (nm) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT, filed by Samuel Hernandez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Copy of Envelope)(nm) |
| If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Bemporad. (nm) |
| THIS CASE HAS BEEN RANDOMLY ASSIGNED TO JUDGE FRED BIERY. (nm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
