Campos v. Amguard Insurance Company
David Campos |
Amguard Insurance Company |
5:2021cv00787 |
August 23, 2021 |
US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
Elizabeth S Chestney |
Jason K Pulliam |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 24, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 SCHEDULING ORDER: ADR Mediation Completed by 9/30/2022, Amended Pleadings due by 11/30/2021, Discovery due by 10/14/2022, Motions due by 1/16/2023,. Signed by Judge Elizabeth S. Chestney. (mgr) |
Filing 9 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Elizabeth S. Chestney: Initial Pretrial Conference held on 9/24/2021 (Minute entry documents are not available electronically.). (Court Reporter FTR Gold.)(mgr) |
Filing 8 PDF with attached Audio File. Court Date & Time [ 9/24/2021 10:05:05 AM ]. File Size [ 7169 KB ]. Run Time [ 00:14:56 ]. (admin). |
Filing 7 First Amended Answer ANSWER to Complaint and Affirmative Defenses by Amguard Insurance Company.(Kressenberg, John) |
Filing 6 Rule 26(f) Discovery Report/Case Management Plan Joint Discovery/Case Management Plan by Amguard Insurance Company. (Kressenberg, John) |
Filing 5 ORDER SETTING TELEPHONIC INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE, ( Scheduling Recommendations/Proposed Scheduling Order due by 9/22/2021,, Pretrial Conference set for 9/24/2021 10:00 AM before Judge Elizabeth S. Chestney,). Signed by Judge Elizabeth S. Chestney. (wg) |
Filing 4 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Elizabeth S. Chestney. Signed by Judge Jason K. Pulliam. (wg) |
Filing 3 Certificate of Interested Parties by Amguard Insurance Company. (Kressenberg, John) |
Filing 2 RULE 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Amguard Insurance Company. (Kressenberg, John) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Amguard Insurance Company (Filing fee $402 receipt number 0542-15144290), filed by Amguard Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Index of Matters Being Filed, #2 Exhibit B - State Court Docket Sheet, #3 Exhibit C - Citation and Plaintiff's Original Petition, #4 Exhibit D _ Defendant's Original Answer, #5 Exhibit E - List of Parties and Counsel, #6 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #7 Supplement Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet)(Kressenberg, John) |
Case assigned to Judge Jason K. Pulliam. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (wg) |
If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Chestney (wg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Campos v. Amguard Insurance Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: David Campos | |
Represented By: | Shaun W. Hodge |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Amguard Insurance Company | |
Represented By: | John Mark Kressenberg |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.