Ruiz et al v. City of San Antonio, Texas et al
| Ninfa Ruiz and Rodrigo Jardon Ayala |
| City of San Antonio, Texas and Joe Castaneda |
| 5:2021cv00855 |
| September 8, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Xavier Rodriguez |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 17
ORDER SETTING STATUS CONFERENCE AND HEARING ON ALL PENDING MOTIONS ( Status Conference set for 12/14/2021 10:30 AM before Judge Xavier Rodriguez). Signed by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. (bc)
|
|
Filing 16
SCHEDULING ORDER:( Final Pretrial Conference set for 10/20/2022 10:30 AM before Judge Xavier Rodriguez. Jury Selection and Jury Trial set for 10/31/2022 10:30 AM before Judge Xavier Rodriguez. ADR Mediation Completed by 7/6/2022, Amended Pleadings due by 2/10/2022, Discovery due by 6/6/2022, and Dispositive Motions due by 7/6/2022). Signed by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. (bc)
|
| Filing 15 Scheduling Recommendations by Rodrigo Jardon Ayala, Ninfa Ruiz. (Hutchison, Susan) |
| Filing 14 Rule 26(f) Discovery Report/Case Management Plan by Rodrigo Jardon Ayala, Ninfa Ruiz. (Hutchison, Susan) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE Vacation Letter by Joe Castaneda (Ralls, Nathan) |
| Filing 12 NON-CONSENT to Trial by US Magistrate Judge by City of San Antonio, Texas. (Urbis, Michael) |
| Filing 11 NON-CONSENT to Trial by US Magistrate Judge by Joe Castaneda. (Ralls, Nathan) |
| Filing 10 CONSENT to Trial by US Magistrate Judge by Rodrigo Jardon Ayala, Ninfa Ruiz. (Hutchison, Susan) |
| Filing 9 Response in Opposition to Motion, filed by Rodrigo Jardon Ayala, Ninfa Ruiz, re #5 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Defendant City of San Antonio, Texas (Hutchison, Susan) |
| Filing 8 Defendant Joe Castaneda's Original ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand . Attorney Nathan Mark Ralls added to party Joe Castaneda(pty:dft) by Joe Castaneda.(Ralls, Nathan) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Ninfa Ruiz, Rodrigo Jardon Ayala. Joe Castaneda served on 9/14/2021, answer due 10/5/2021. (Hutchison, Susan) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER --It is ORDERED that the Plaintiff(s) confer with the Defendant(s) as required by Fed. R. Civ. P 26(f) to submit (1) a proposed scheduling order and (2) a Rule 26(f) Report in the formats shown in the attached documents for the Courts consideration by November 4, 2021. Signed by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. (mgr)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss by City of San Antonio, Texas. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Order to Dismiss)(Urbis, Michael) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Ninfa Ruiz, Rodrigo Jardon Ayala. City of San Antonio, Texas served on 9/13/2021, answer due 10/4/2021. (Hutchison, Susan) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Joe Castaneda and City of San Antonio, Texas. (bc) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Rodrigo Jardon Ayala, Ninfa Ruiz. (Hutchison, Susan) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0542-15200095). No Summons requested at this time, filed by Ninfa Ruiz, Rodrigo Jardon Ayala. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Hutchison, Susan) |
| If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Bemporad (mgr) |
| Case assigned to Judge Xavier Rodriguez. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (mgr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
