Alejandro Mendoza v. Foot Locker Retail, Inc.
Plaintiff: Alejandro Mendoza
Defendant: Foot Locker Retail, Inc.
Case Number: 5:2021cv00903
Filed: September 21, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Xavier Rodriguez
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 623
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 15 SCHEDULING ORDER: Pretrial Conference set for 1/12/2023 10:30 AM before Judge Xavier Rodriguez, Jury Trial set for 1/23/2023 10:30 AM before Judge Xavier Rodriguez, ADR Report Deadline due by 3/23/2022, Amended Pleadings due by 11/16/2021, Discovery due by 8/17/2022, Joinder of Parties due by 11/16/2021, Dispositive Motions due by 9/19/2022. Signed by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. (rg)
November 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER (Setting Status Conference and Hearing on all pending motions for 1/6/2022 10:30 AM before Judge Xavier Rodriguez). Signed by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. (rg)
November 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Text Order DENYING without prejudice #13 Motion for Protective Order entered by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. The parties are directed to use the form protective order located in Appendix H to the Local Rules or file a motion explaining why a different protective order is requested. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ldox)
November 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 Joint MOTION for Protective Order by Foot Locker Retail, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Bennett, Norma)
November 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 Scheduling Recommendations/Proposed Scheduling Order (Agreed) by Foot Locker Retail, Inc.. (Bennett, Norma)
November 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 Rule 26(f) Discovery Report/Case Management Plan (Joint) by Foot Locker Retail, Inc.. (Bennett, Norma)
November 11, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 NON-CONSENT to Trial by US Magistrate Judge by Alejandro Mendoza. (Rush, Cory)
November 11, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 NON-CONSENT to Trial by US Magistrate Judge by Foot Locker Retail, Inc.. (Pedersen, Emily)
November 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ATTACHMENT proposed Order to #7 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Norma N. Bennett on behalf of Emily M Pedersen ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-15403537) by Foot Locker Retail, Inc.. (Bennett, Norma)
November 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Norma N. Bennett on behalf of Emily M Pedersen ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-15403537) by on behalf of Foot Locker Retail, Inc.. (Bennett, Norma)
November 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Text Order GRANTING #7 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice entered by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted permission to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ldox)
October 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER AND ADVISORY (Proposed Scheduling Order due by 11/15/2021) The parties are hereby ORDERED to notify the Court whether or not they consent toMagistrate Judge jurisdiction within thirty (30) days of the date of the filing of this Order. Signed by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. (rg)
October 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Defendant Foot Locker Retail, Inc.'s Affirmative Defenses and ANSWER to #1 Complaint . Attorney Norma N. Bennett added to party Foot Locker Retail, Inc.(pty:dft) by Foot Locker Retail, Inc..(Bennett, Norma)
September 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Foot Locker Retail, Inc. (rg)
September 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Pro Hac Vice Letter to attorney Maureen Farrell for Alejandro Mendoza. (rg)
September 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Case assigned to Judge Xavier Rodriguez. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (rg)
September 21, 2021 Opinion or Order If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Chestney. (rg)
September 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Alejandro Mendoza. (Rush, Cory)
September 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT and Request for Summons ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0542-15248241), filed by Alejandro Mendoza. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Personal Data Sheet)(Rush, Cory)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Alejandro Mendoza v. Foot Locker Retail, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alejandro Mendoza
Represented By: Cory Rush
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Foot Locker Retail, Inc.
Represented By: Norma N. Bennett
Represented By: Emily M. Pedersen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?