Pena, Jr. v. Greystone Property Management Corporation
Juan Pena, Jr. |
Greystone Property Management Corporation |
5:2021cv00949 |
October 6, 2021 |
US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
Xavier Rodriguez |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ORDER AND ADVISORY --It is ORDERED that the Plaintiff(s) confer with the Defendant(s) as required by FED. R. CIV. P. 26(f) to submit (1) a proposed scheduling order and (2) a Rule 26(f) Report in the formats shown in the attached documents for the Courts consideration by January 10, 2022. Signed by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. (mgr) |
Filing 8 RULE 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Greystone Property Management Corporation. (Richter, Patrick) |
Filing 7 Defendant's ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Greystone Property Management Corporation.(Richter, Patrick) |
Text Order GRANTING #6 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer entered by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. Defendant shall have until November 24, 2021 to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Original Complaint. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (JA3) |
Reset Deadlines: Greystone Property Management Corporation answer due 11/24/2021. (bc) |
Filing 6 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by Greystone Property Management Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Richter, Patrick) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Patrick S. Richter on behalf of Greystone Property Management Corporation. Attorney Patrick S. Richter added to party Greystone Property Management Corporation(pty:dft) (Richter, Patrick) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Juan Pena, Jr.. Greystone Property Management Corporation served on 10/13/2021, answer due 11/3/2021. (Sanford, Josh) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Greystone Property Management Corporation. (bc) |
Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Juan Pena, Jr.. (Sanford, Josh) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0542-15303409), filed by Juan Pena, Jr.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Sanford, Josh) |
If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Farrer (bc) |
Case assigned to Judge Xavier Rodriguez. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (bc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Pena, Jr. v. Greystone Property Management Corporation | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Juan Pena, Jr. | |
Represented By: | Josh Sanford |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Greystone Property Management Corporation | |
Represented By: | Patrick S. Richter |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.