Comeaux v. TDCJ-CID Martins Ochala, et al
Glen Edward Comeaux |
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Martins Ochala, Basil Eronini, TDCJ-CID Martins Ochala and TDCJ-CID Basil Eronini |
5:2021cv01010 |
October 18, 2021 |
US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
Jason K Pulliam |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 FINAL JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Jason K. Pulliam. (mgr) |
Filing 10 ORDER OF DISMISSAL, Copy routed to Operations Department. Signed by Judge Jason K. Pulliam. (mgr) |
Filing 9 PRO SE SUPPLEMENT to #8 Amended Complaint by Glen Edward Comeaux. (bc) |
Filing 8 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Basil Eronini and Martins Ochala amending #1 Complaint, filed by Glen Edward Comeaux.(bc) |
Mailed out #7 Order Granting IFP and Directing Show Cause along with a Prisoner's Civil Rights Complaint form to the Plaintiff at the TDCJ-Connally Unit (bc) |
Filing 7 ORDER GRANTING #2 IFP and DIRECTING COMEAUX TO SHOW CAUSE --The Court has determined his request to proceed IFP (ECF No. 2) should be GRANTED. Plaintiff's Complaint (ECF No. 1) is accepted by the Court without prepayment of fees, costs, or security. IT IS ORDERED that within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order, Comeaux must show cause why his Complaint (ECF No. 1) should not be dismissed pursuant to 1915(e)(2)(B)(i)(ii) and 1915A(b)(1), for failure to state a non-frivolous claim, by filing an amended complaint that cures the deficiencies noted in this Order. The Clerk of Court is directed to provide Comeaux with a copy of a Section 1983 form. Signed by Judge Jason K. Pulliam. (bc) |
Filing 6 Case Opening Letter sent to Glen Edward Comeaux at the TDCJ-John B. Connally Unit. (bc) |
If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Bemporad (bc) |
Case assigned to Judge Jason K. Pulliam. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (bc) |
Filing 5 Case electronically transferred in from Eastern District of Louisiana; Case Number 2:21-cv-01707. |
Filing 4 ORDER ADOPTING #3 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. IT IS ORDERED that the 42 U.S.C. 1983 complaint filed by Glen Edward Comeaux is transferred to the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, San Antonio Division. Signed by Judge Lance M Africk on 10/18/2021.(cwa) [Transferred from Louisiana Eastern on 10/18/2021.] |
Filing 3 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Complaint: IT IS RECOMMENDED that the captioned matter be transferred to the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, San Antonio Division, as set forth herein. The pending motion to proceed as a pauper (rec. doc. 2) is DEFERRED to the transferee court for consideration. Objections to R&R due by 10/6/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael North on 9/22/2021.(jls) [Transferred from Louisiana Eastern on 10/18/2021.] |
Filing 2 EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Glen Edward Comeaux. Motion(s) referred to Michael North. (js) [Transferred from Louisiana Eastern on 10/18/2021.] |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Glen Edward Comeaux. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(js) [Transferred from Louisiana Eastern on 10/18/2021.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.