Rogers v. Lumpkin
Aaron Michael Rogers |
Major Bobby Lumpkin |
5:2021cv01037 |
October 25, 2021 |
US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
Jason K Pulliam |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 ORDER DENYING re #7 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Aaron Michael Rogers, Petitioner shall submit to the Clerk of the Court, within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order, the necessary $5 amount in payment of fees. Failure to comply with the Courts order may result in a dismissalfor want of prosecution. Signed by Judge Jason K. Pulliam. (wg) |
Filing 7 PRO-SE MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis by Aaron Michael Rogers. (wg) |
Filing 6 NON-CONSENT to Trial by US Magistrate Judge by Aaron Michael Rogers Received. (Document is maintained under seal in the Clerk's Office). (wg) |
Filing 5 DEFICIENCY ORDER, It is ORDERED that, within thirty (30) days of the filing of this Order, Petitioner must submit to the Court either the required filing fee of $5.00 or a completed application to proceed IFP. If the petitioner submits an IFP application, it must include a current institutional trust fund accountstatement showing deposits and balances to Petitioners institutional account for the previous six months. The Clerk of the Court is directed to forward Petitioner this Courts standard IFP application. Signed by Judge Jason K. Pulliam. (wg) |
Remark: Copy of Order & IFP Form sent to the Petitioner listed address. (wg) |
If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Farrer (wg) |
Case assigned to Judge Jason K. Pulliam. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (wg) |
Filing 4 Case electronically transferred in from Southern District of Texas; Case Number 4:21-cv-03389. |
Filing 3 ORDER TO TRANSFER CASE to Western District of Texas, San Antonio Division (Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified.(olindor, 4) [Transferred from Texas Southern on 10/25/2021.] |
Interdistrict transfer to Western District of Texas. Case transferred electronically. Case terminated on 10/25/2021, filed. (olindor, 4) [Transferred from Texas Southern on 10/25/2021.] |
Filing 2 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (bgoolsby, 4) [Transferred from Texas Southern on 10/25/2021.] |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5) filed by Aaron Michael Rogers.(bgoolsby, 4) [Transferred from Texas Southern on 10/25/2021.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Rogers v. Lumpkin | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Aaron Michael Rogers | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Major Bobby Lumpkin | |
Represented By: | Edward L. Marshall |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.