Hayes v. Rayford et al
| Abraham Bundu Hayes |
| Phonso Rayford and Jesus Avalos |
| 5:2021cv01039 |
| October 26, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Orlando L Garcia |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 17
PRO-SE MOTION to Amend Complaint by Abraham Bundu Hayes. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Amended Complaint, #2 Exhibit C, #3 Exhibit, #4 Envelope)(wg)
|
|
Filing 16
ADVISORY TO THE COURT by Abraham Bundu Hayes. (mgr)
|
|
Filing 15
ORDER DENYING #11 Motion to Appoint Counsel ; DENYING #13 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; DENYING #13 Motion for TRO Signed by Chief Judge Orlando L. Garcia. (mgr)
|
|
Filing 14
ORDER Directing Monthly Payments be made from Prison Account of Abraham Bundu Hayes, #2130917. Signed by Chief Judge Orlando L. Garcia. (mgr)
|
|
Filing 13
PRO-SE MOTION for Preliminary Injunction, MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by Abraham Bundu Hayes. (wg)
|
|
Filing 12
PRO-SE AMENDED COMPLAINT against Jesus Avalos, Phonso Rayford amending #1 Complaint., filed by Abraham Bundu Hayes. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Request Summons, #2 Supplement Envelope/Cover Letter)(wg) (Main Document 12 replaced on 12/17/2021) (wg).
|
|
Filing 11
PRO-SE MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Abraham Bundu Hayes. (wg)
|
|
Filing 10
PRO-SE MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis by Abraham Bundu Hayes. (wg)
|
|
Filing 9
Letter/Correspondence from Abraham Bundu Hayes. (wg)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER --IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order, Hayes shall either pay the filing fee or submit a signed Application to Proceed IFP, along with a current six (6) month history of his inmate trust fund account. Signed by Chief Judge Orlando L. Garcia. (bc)
|
|
Filing 7
Case Opening Letter- Abraham Hayes. (bc)
|
|
Filing 6
Case electronically transferred in from Southern District of Texas; Case Number 2:21-cv-00244.
|
|
Case assigned to Chief Judge Orlando L. Garcia. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (bc)
|
|
If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Bemporad (bc)
|
|
Filing 5
OPINION AND ORDER TO TRANSFER CASE to US District Court for the Western District of Texas, San Antonio Division; all pending motions are DENIED as moot.(Signed by Magistrate Judge Jason B Libby) Parties notified.(RochelleLimon, 2) [Transferred from Texas Southern on 10/26/2021.]
|
|
Interdistrict transfer to US District Court for the Western District of Texas, San Antonio Division. Case transferred electronically. Case terminated on 10/26/2021, filed. (RochelleLimon, 2) [Transferred from Texas Southern on 10/26/2021.]
|
|
Filing 4
CLERKS NOTICE OF DEFICIENT PLEADING as to Abraham Bundu Hayes. Parties notified Notice of Compliance due by 11/15/2021, filed. (NicoleTirado, 2) [Transferred from Texas Southern on 10/26/2021.]
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE of Exclusion, filed. (NicoleTirado, 2) [Transferred from Texas Southern on 10/26/2021.]
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (NicoleTirado, 2) [Transferred from Texas Southern on 10/26/2021.]
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Abraham Bundu Hayes. (Attachments: #1 Attachments, #2 Envelope)(NicoleTirado, 2) [Transferred from Texas Southern on 10/26/2021.]
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
