Bradley v. Department of the Navy et al
| Shamar Bradley |
| Department of the Navy, Alexander Niepraschk, Leighanna Cunningham, Jason B. Smith, Honorable Monique Binswanger and Merit Systems Protection Board |
| 5:2021cv01151 |
| November 19, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Henry J Bemporad |
| Fred Biery |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 COMPLAINT, filed by Shamar Bradley. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(mgr) (Main Document 6 replaced on 12/14/2021) (mgr). |
Filing 5
ORDER GRANTING #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Signed by Judge Henry J. Bemporad. (mgr)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER DENYING #2 Pro Se Motion for Permission to file Electronically Signed by Judge Henry J. Bemporad. (mgr)
|
| Filing 3 Case Opening Letter to Shamar Bradley. (nm) |
| Filing 2 Pro Se MOTION for Permission to file Electronically by Shamar Bradley.. Motions referred to Judge Henry J. Bemporad. (nm) |
| Filing 1 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis by Shamar Bradley. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet). Motions referred to Judge Henry J. Bemporad. (nm) |
| CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Henry J. Bemporad. (nm) |
| THIS CASE HAS BEEN RANDOMLY ASSIGNED TO JUDGE FRED BIERY. (nm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
