Bradley v. Hopkins et al
| Shamar Bradley |
| Robert Craig Hopkins, Craig Hopkins, Kevin Goodwin, Naji Khaled Tabet, James Otis Kopp, Christina Sanchez, Vincent Vega, Maria Vargas-Yates and City of San Antonio |
| 5:2021cv01208 |
| December 6, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Fred Biery |
| Elizabeth S Chestney |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER GRANTING. re #1 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Shamar Bradley, Plaintiffs Complaint shall be filed by the Clerk without prepayment of fees, costs or the giving of security therefor, and the Clerk shall, until further Order of this Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that on or before January 13, 2021, Plaintiff shall file a More Definite Statement of the claims he seeks to present to this Court. Signed by Judge Elizabeth S. Chestney. (wg)
|
| Filing 2 Case Opening Letter to Shamar Bradley. (dtg) (Main Document 2 replaced on 12/8/2021) (dtg). |
| Filing 1 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis by Shamar Bradley. (Attachments: #1 Proposed UNSIGNED Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Copy of Envelope). Motions referred to Judge Elizabeth S. Chestney. (dtg) |
| CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Elizabeth S. Chestney. (dtg) |
| THIS CASE HAS BEEN RANDOMLY ASSIGNED TO JUDGE FRED BIERY. (dtg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
