Smithson v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
Plaintiff: Jimmy J. Smithson
Defendant: Union Pacific Railroad Company
Case Number: 5:2021cv01225
Filed: December 13, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Xavier Rodriguez
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Text Order GRANTING #18 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice entered by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted permission to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ldox)
February 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 18 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Lucas J. Kaster ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 500059800) by Jimmy J. Smithson. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Copy of Receipt)(nm)
February 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 17 REPLY to Response to Motion, filed by Union Pacific Railroad Company, re #9 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company (de Leon, Lara)
January 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 16 Pro Hac Vice Letter to Lucas J. Kaster. (nm)
January 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 15 Pro Hac Vice Letter to James H. Kaster. (nm)
January 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 RESPONSE to Motion, filed by Jimmy J. Smithson, re #9 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company (Barney, Gavin)
January 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Lara Cardin de Leon of Jasmine L. Anderson ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-15627354) by on behalf of Union Pacific Railroad Company. (de Leon, Lara)
January 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Text Order GRANTING #13 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice entered by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted permission to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ldox)
January 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Text Order GRANTING #12 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice entered by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted permission to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ldox)
January 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Lara Cardin de Leon of Katie M. Rhoten ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-15618405) by on behalf of Union Pacific Railroad Company. (de Leon, Lara)
January 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 Pro Hac Vice Letter- Jasmine L. Anderson and Katie M. Rhoten. (bc)
January 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER AND ADVISORY--It is ORDERED that the Plaintiff(s) confer with the Defendant(s) as required by Fed. R. Civ. P 26(f) to submit (1) a proposed scheduling order and (2) a Rule 26(f) Report in the formats shown in the attached documents for the Courts consideration by February 14, 2022.. Signed by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. (nm)
January 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss by Union Pacific Railroad Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit Exhibit E, #6 Proposed Order Proposed Order)(de Leon, Lara)
January 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Certificate of Interested Parties by Union Pacific Railroad Company. (de Leon, Lara)
January 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Defendant's ANSWER to #1 Complaint . Attorney Lara Cardin de Leon added to party Union Pacific Railroad Company(pty:dft) by Union Pacific Railroad Company.(de Leon, Lara)
December 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Notice of Correction: ***NOTIFIED ALL PARTIES THAT THE ENTRY WAS MODIFIED TO CORRECT THE SERVICE DATE AND ANSWER DUE DATE.*** re #6 Certificate of Service. (bc)
December 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jimmy J. Smithson. Union Pacific Railroad Company served on 12/21/2021, answer due 1/11/2022. (Barney, Gavin) Modified on 12/27/2021 To edit text (bc).
December 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Text Order GRANTING #4 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice entered by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted permission to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ldox)
December 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Text Order GRANTING #3 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice entered by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted permission to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ldox)
December 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Union Pacific Railroad Company. (nm)
December 13, 2021 Opinion or Order If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Farrer. (nm)
December 13, 2021 Opinion or Order Case assigned to Judge Xavier Rodriguez. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (nm)
December 13, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Anthony S. Petru ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-15527290) by on behalf of Jimmy J. Smithson. (Petru, Anthony)
December 13, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Gavin S. Barney ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-15527244) by on behalf of Jimmy J. Smithson. (Barney, Gavin)
December 13, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Jimmy J. Smithson. (Barney, Gavin)
December 13, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Damages ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0542-15526567), filed by Jimmy J. Smithson. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Barney, Gavin)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smithson v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jimmy J. Smithson
Represented By: Gavin S. Barney
Represented By: Anthony S. Petru
Represented By: Lucas J. Kaster
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Union Pacific Railroad Company
Represented By: Lara Cardin de Leon
Represented By: Jasmine L. Anderson
Represented By: Katie M. Rhoten
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?