Moreno v. Bexar County Adult Detention Center, et al
| Jesus Moreno |
| Bexar County Adult Detention Center, J. Garza and Officer FNU Garcia |
| 5:2021cv01249 |
| December 15, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Jason K Pulliam |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Sent a copy of order (4) to Sgt. Abraham Abraham and a copy of order (4) and a blank 1983 complaint form to plaintiff. (nm) |
Filing 4
ORDER Directing Monthly Payments be made from Prison Account of Jesus Moreno, #0827824. Granted #2 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Jesus Moreno. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE as to Jesus Moreno. IT IS ORDERED that within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order, Moreno must show cause why his Complaint (ECF No. 1) should not be dismissed. Signed by Judge Jason K. Pulliam. (nm) Modified on 1/31/2022 (nm).
|
| Filing 3 Case Opening Letter by Jesus Moreno. (cd) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jesus Moreno. (cd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT, filed by Jesus Moreno. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Copy of Envelope)(cd) |
| If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Chestney (cd) |
| THIS CASE HAS BEEN RANDOMLY ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JASON K. PULLIAM (cd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
