Goodale v. Seguin et al
Plaintiff: Samantha Nichole Houston Goodale
Defendant: Mark Seguin, Nathan Bundy and The City of San Antonio, Texas
Case Number: 5:2022cv00031
Filed: January 13, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Xavier Rodriguez
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Samantha Nichole Houston Goodale. Mark Seguin served on 2/14/2022, answer due 3/7/2022. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Affidavit of service)(Maloney, Tim)
February 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Original ANSWER to #1 Complaint corrected by Nathan Bundy.(Kosanovich, Mark)
February 11, 2022 Opinion or Order DEFICIENCY NOTICE:***DOCUMENT DEFICIENT -INCORRECT CASE NUMBER ON DOCUMENT-PLEASE RE-FILE WITH CORRECT CASE NUMBER*** re #4 Answer to Complaint, (mgr)
February 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ***DOCUMENT DEFICIENT -INCORRECT CASE NUMBER ON DOCUMENT-PLEASE RE-FILE WITH CORRECT CASE NUMBER***Original ANSWER to #1 Complaint . Attorney Mark Kosanovich added to party Nathan Bundy(pty:dft) by Nathan Bundy.(Kosanovich, Mark) Modified on 2/11/2022 (mgr).
February 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORIGINAL ANSWER to #1 Complaint . Attorney Charles Straith Frigerio added to party The City of San Antonio, Texas(pty:dft) by The City of San Antonio, Texas.(Frigerio, Charles)
January 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Nathan Bundy, Mark Seguin, The City of San Antonio, Texas, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (dtg)
January 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT (Filing fee $402.00 receipt number 500059639), filed by Samantha Nichole Houston Goodale. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Filing Fee Receipt)(dtg)
January 13, 2022 Opinion or Order If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Chestney. (dtg)
January 13, 2022 Opinion or Order THIS CASE HAS BEEN RANDOMLY ASSIGNED TO JUDGE XAVIER RODRIGUEZ. (dtg)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Goodale v. Seguin et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Samantha Nichole Houston Goodale
Represented By: Eric Andrew Campolo
Represented By: Patrick James Toscano
Represented By: Tim Maloney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mark Seguin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nathan Bundy
Represented By: Mark Kosanovich
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The City of San Antonio, Texas
Represented By: Charles Straith Frigerio
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?