Champion v. Phaselink Utility Solutions, LLC et al
| Jennifer Champion |
| PHASELINK UTILITY SOLUTIONS, LLC, Yanping Wolfe and Daryl Bennett |
| 5:2022cv00145 |
| February 17, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Richard B Farrer |
| Jason K Pulliam |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Text Order GRANTING #12 Motion for Extension of Time to File entered by Judge Richard B. Farrer. The deadline for Plaintiff to file a Motion for Final Default Judgment is extended to June 21, 2022. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (LR)
|
| Filing 12 MOTION for Extension of Time to File for Entry of Final Default Judgment by Jennifer Champion. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order). Motions referred to Judge Richard B. Farrer. (Alexander, William) |
| Filing 11 Clerk's ENTRY OF DEFAULT as to Phaselink Utility Solutions, LLC (nm) |
| Filing 10 MOTION for Clerk's Entry of Default against PhaseLink Utility Solutions, LLC and Daryl Bennett by Jennifer Champion. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex A - Affidavit in Support). Motions referred to Judge Richard B. Farrer. (Alexander, William) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER--IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT within 21 days from the date of this Order, the Plaintiff shall move for entry of default and default judgment in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55. Failure to timely do so will subject Plaintiffs claims to dismissal. Signed by Judge Richard B. Farrer. (nm)
|
| Filing 8 STIPULATION of Dismissal Without Prejudice by Jennifer Champion. (Alexander, William) |
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Yanping Wolfe answer due 5/11/2022. (nm) |
|
Text Order GRANTING as UNOPPOSED #7 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer entered by Judge Richard B. Farrer. Defendant Yanping Wolfe's deadline to respond to Plaintiff's Original Complaint is extended until May 11, 2022. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (LR)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Yanping Wolfe. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order). Motions referred to Judge Richard B. Farrer. (Temple, Mark) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Mark D. Temple on behalf of Yanping Wolfe. Attorney Mark D. Temple added to party Yanping Wolfe(pty:dft) (Temple, Mark) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jennifer Champion. Daryl Bennett served on 3/31/2022, answer due 4/21/2022; Phaselink Utility Solutions, LLC served on 3/31/2022, answer due 4/21/2022; Yanping Wolfe served on 4/6/2022, answer due 4/27/2022. (Alexander, William) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (nm) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Richard B. Farrer. Signed by Judge Jason K. Pulliam. (nm)
|
| Case assigned to Judge Jason K. Pulliam. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (mgr) |
| If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Farrer (mgr) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Jennifer Champion. (Alexander, William) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0542-15726185), filed by Jennifer Champion. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Employment Contract)(Alexander, William) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
