John B. Williams v. J. Charles Bunk Law Offices et al
| John B Williams and John B. Williams, III |
| J. Charles Bunk Law Offices, Law Offices of Edward Francis Shaunessey III, Raymond E. Fuchs, Law Offices of Richard E. Langlois, Judge Melisa Skinner, Judge Sid L. Harle, Judge Ron Rangel, Tricia Austin and Judge Nelson W. Wolff |
| 5:2022cv00258 |
| March 16, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Henry J Bemporad |
| Orlando L Garcia |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 27 PRO-SE MOTION PLAINTIFF'S SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION TO REPLY TO BUNK. SHAUNESSEY III, by John B. Williams, III.. Motions referred to Judge Henry J. Bemporad. (wg) |
| Filing 26 Response in Opposition to Motion, filed by Sid L. Harle, Ron Rangel, Melisa Skinner, re #22 MOTION Joinder of Parties re #20 Reply to Response to Motion filed by Plaintiff John B. Williams, III (Graydon, Scot) |
| Filing 25 Defendant's Response in Opposition to Motion, filed by Tricia Austin, Nelson W. Wolff, re #19 MOTION for Default Judgment against Hon. Nelson Wolff & Tricia Austin filed by Plaintiff John B. Williams, III (Piatt, Robert) |
| Filing 24 Amended MOTION to Dismiss by Law Offices of Richard E. Langlois. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit). Motions referred to Judge Henry J. Bemporad. (Langlois, Richard) |
| Filing 21 REPLY to Response to Motion, filed by J. Charles Bunk Law Offices, Law Offices of Edward Francis Shaunessey III, re #9 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Defendant J. Charles Bunk Law Offices, Defendant Law Offices of Edward Francis Shaunessey III (Carroll, John) |
| Filing 23 PRO-SE MOTION for Default Judgment against Richard E. Langlois by John B. Williams, III.. Motions referred to Judge Henry J. Bemporad. (wg) |
| Filing 22 PRO-SE MOTION for Joinder of Parties, and Response re #20 Reply to Response to Motion by John B. Williams, III.. Motions referred to Judge Henry J. Bemporad. (wg) |
| Filing 20 REPLY to Response to Motion, filed by Sid L. Harle, Melisa Skinner, re #5 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Defendant Sid L. Harle, Defendant Melisa Skinner (Graydon, Scot) |
| Filing 19 PRO-SE MOTION for Default Judgment against Hon. Nelson Wolff & Tricia Austin by John B. Williams, III.. Motions referred to Judge Henry J. Bemporad. (wg) |
| Filing 18 PRO-SE MOTION for Default Judgment against Bexar County Auditor's Office & Leo Caldera.. Motions referred to Judge Henry J. Bemporad. (wg) |
| Filing 17 SUMMONS Returned Executed by John B. Williams, III. Ron Rangel served on 3/24/2022, answer due 4/14/2022. (wg) |
| Filing 16 SUMMONS Returned Executed by John B. Williams, III. Tricia Austin served on 3/24/2022, answer due 4/14/2022. (wg) |
| Filing 15 PRO-SE RESPONSE to #9 DEFENDANT'S MOTION to Dismiss by John B. Williams, III. (wg) |
| Filing 14 PRO-SE RESPONSE to #8 MOTION to Dismiss by John B. Williams, III. (wg) |
| Filing 13 DEFENDANT'S REPLY to Response to Motion, filed by Ron Rangel, re #6 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Defendant Ron Rangel (Graydon, Scot) |
Filing 12
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Henry J. Bemporad. Signed by Chief Judge Orlando L. Garcia.. Referral Magistrate Judge: Henry J. Bemporad. (wg)
|
| Filing 11 PRO-SE PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE to Motion, filed by John B. Williams, III, re #6 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Defendant Ron Rangel, #5 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Defendant Sid L. Harle, Defendant Melisa Skinner (wg) |
| Filing 10 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Tricia Austin, Nelson W. Wolff. (Piatt, Robert) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss by J. Charles Bunk Law Offices, Law Offices of Edward Francis Shaunessey III. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Carroll, John) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss by Raymond E. Fuchs. (Fuchs, Raymond) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint by Law Offices of Richard E. Langlois.(Langlois, Richard) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss by Ron Rangel. (Graydon, Scot) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss by Sid L. Harle, Melisa Skinner. (Graydon, Scot) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by John B. Williams, III. Raymond E. Fuchs served on 3/22/2022, answer due 4/12/2022. (wg) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by John B. Williams, III. Sid L. Harle served on 3/17/2022, answer due 4/7/2022; J. Charles Bunk Law Offices served on 3/17/2022, answer due 4/7/2022; Law Offices of Edward Francis Shaunessey III served on 3/17/2022, answer due 4/7/2022; Law Offices of Richard E. Langlois served on 3/17/2022, answer due 4/7/2022; Melisa Skinner served on 3/17/2022, answer due 4/7/2022; Nelson W. Wolff served on 3/17/2022, answer due 4/7/2022. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Summons, #2 Affidavit Summons, #3 Affidavit Summons, #4 Affidavit Summons, #5 Affidavit Summons, #6 Affidavit Summons, #7 Affidavit Summons)(wg) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Tricia Austin, Raymond E. Fuchs, Sid L. Harle, J. Charles Bunk Law Offices, Law Offices of Edward Francis Shaunessey III, Law Offices of Richard E. Langlois, Ron Rangel, Melisa Skinner, Nelson W. Wolff. (bt) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 500060183), filed by John B Williams. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Copy of receipt)(bt) |
| If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Bemporad. (bt) |
| THIS CASE HAS BEEN RANDOMLY ASSIGNED TO CHIEF JUDGE ORLANDO L. GARCIA. (bt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
