Travis McClinton v. Tax Rise, Inc.
| Travis McClinton |
| Tax Rise, Inc. |
| 5:2022cv00298 |
| March 25, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Orlando L Garcia |
| Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) |
| 47 U.S.C. ยง 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Scheduling Recommendations/Proposed Scheduling Order by Travis McClinton. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Hiraldo, Manuel) |
Filing 7
Order for Scheduling Recommendations/Proposed Scheduling Order. Scheduling recommendations/proposed scheduling order due to the Court within forty five (45) days of the filing of this Order., Notice of right to consent to disposition of a civil case by a U.S. Magistrate Judge. Signed by Chief Judge Orlando L. Garcia. (wg)
|
|
Text Order GRANTING #6 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice Roni M. Most. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order. entered by Chief Judge Orlando L. Garcia. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ju)
|
| Filing 6 Proposed MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Michael A. Lamson ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-16067396) by on behalf of Tax Rise, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Lamson, Michael) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER to #1 Complaint . Attorney Michael A. Lamson added to party Tax Rise, Inc.(pty:dft) by Tax Rise, Inc..(Lamson, Michael) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Travis McClinton. Tax Rise, Inc. served on 4/4/2022, answer due 4/25/2022. (Hiraldo, Manuel) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Tax Rise, Inc. (rg) |
| Case assigned to Chief Judge Orlando L. Garcia. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (rg) |
| If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Farrer. (rg) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Travis McClinton. (Hiraldo, Manuel) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0542-15857595), filed by Travis McClinton. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit - Summons)(Hiraldo, Manuel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Travis McClinton v. Tax Rise, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Travis McClinton | |
| Represented By: | Manuel S. Hiraldo |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Tax Rise, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Michael A. Lamson |
| Represented By: | Roni M. Most |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
