Acevedo v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.
Plaintiff: Alejandro Emanuel Clay Acevedo
Defendant: Experian Information Solutions, Inc.
Case Number: 5:2022cv00308
Filed: March 29, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Elizabeth S Chestney
Referring Judge: Orlando L Garcia
Nature of Suit: Truth in Lending
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: DENIED #1 Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Alejandro Emanuel Clay Acevedo, #4 Report and Recommendations. It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff pay the filing fee within thirty (30) days from the date below; if the filing fee is not paid timely, in full, Plaintiff's proposed complaint will be dismissed for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with the Courts order. Signed by Chief Judge Orlando L. Garcia. (bc)
May 10, 2022 Filing 6 Certified Mail Receipt of #5 Order, Case No Longer Referred to Magistrate Judge, #4 Report and Recommendations, (wg)
May 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER RETURNING CASE TO DISTRICT COURT re #1 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Alejandro Emanuel Clay Acevedo, CASE NO LONGER REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Elizabeth S. Chestney. Signed by Judge Elizabeth S. Chestney. (wg)
May 10, 2022 Filing 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #1 Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Alejandro Emanuel Clay Acevedo. The United States District Clerk shall serve a copy of this report and recommendation on all parties by either electronic transmittal to all parties represented by attorneys registered asa filing user with the clerk of court, or by mailing a copy to those not registered by certified mail, return receipt requested. Signed by Judge Elizabeth S. Chestney. (wg)
April 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER that Plaintiff file the described supplementation regarding monthly income, expenses, etc., sworn as true and correct under penalty of perjury, on or before April 18, 2021. re #1 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Alejandro Emanuel Clay Acevedo. Signed by Judge Elizabeth S. Chestney. (wg)
March 29, 2022 Filing 2 Case Opening Letter to Alejandro Emanuel Clay Acevedo. (dtg)
March 29, 2022 Filing 1 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis by Alejandro Emanuel Clay Acevedo. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons). Motions referred to Judge Elizabeth S. Chestney. (dtg)
March 29, 2022 CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Elizabeth S. Chestney. (dtg)
March 29, 2022 THIS CASE HAS BEEN RANDOMLY ASSIGNED TO CHIEF JUDGE ORLANDO L. GARCIA. (dtg)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Acevedo v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alejandro Emanuel Clay Acevedo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Experian Information Solutions, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?