ACERA SURGICAL, INC. et al v. REGENISOURCE LLC
ACERA SURGICAL, INC., RETECTIX, LLC and WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY |
REGENISOURCE LLC |
5:2022cv00447 |
May 6, 2022 |
US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
Orlando L Garcia |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Text Order GRANTING #4 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Benjamin J. Everton. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order. entered by Chief Judge Orlando L. Garcia. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ju) |
Text Order GRANTING #5 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Jonathan E. Bachand. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order. entered by Chief Judge Orlando L. Garcia. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ju) |
Text Order GRANTING #6 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Joseph F. Jennings. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order. entered by Chief Judge Orlando L. Garcia. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ju) |
Filing 6 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by John Marcus Bustamante for Attorney Joseph F. Jennings ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-16062862) by on behalf of ACERA SURGICAL, INC., RETECTIX, LLC, WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Attachment A)(Bustamante, John) |
Filing 5 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by John Marcus Bustamante for Attorney Jonathan E. Bachand ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-16062845) by on behalf of ACERA SURGICAL, INC., RETECTIX, LLC, WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Attachment A)(Bustamante, John) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by John Marcus Bustamante for Attorney Benjamin J. Everton ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0542-16062813) by on behalf of ACERA SURGICAL, INC., RETECTIX, LLC, WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY. (Bustamante, John) |
Filing 3 Report on Patent/Trademark sent to U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (wg) |
Case assigned to Chief Judge Orlando L. Garcia. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (wg) |
If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Farrer (wg) |
Filing 2 RULE 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by ACERA SURGICAL, INC., RETECTIX, LLC, WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY. (Bustamante, John) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0542-16007211). No Summons requested at this time, filed by ACERA SURGICAL, INC., WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY, RETECTIX, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Bustamante, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.