Murry v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY
| Elizabeth Murry |
| ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY |
| 5:2022cv00552 |
| May 27, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Richard B Farrer |
| Jason K Pulliam |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Declaratory Judgemen |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Text Order CONDITIONALLY GRANTING #9 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. It is this Court's policy to require all counsel to apply for admission to the Western District's federal bar and to follow through with the application as a condition of appearance pro hac vice in any case. Our records indicate that this is Jenna Cornejo's fourth application to appear pro hac vice in the Western District of Texas. Accordingly, Ms. Cornejo may appear in this case pro hac vice, provided that she applies for admission to the Western District of Texas and be admitted to practice in the Western District of Texas within 180 days from the date of this order. Should Ms. Cornejo fail to comply with this Court's order, she will no longer be permitted to represent the Plaintiff in this case. Should Ms. Cornejo not wish to be admitted to this District, she may file a motion to withdraw as counsel in this case. The Court further ORDERS that counsel become familiar with the Local Court Rules of the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, a copy of which may be obtained from the United States District Clerk for the Western District of Texas or from the Court's website. If not already done, counsel appearing pro hac vice must immediately tender the amount of $100 to the Clerk of the Court, payable to: Clerk, U.S. District Court, in compliance with Local Rule AT-1(f)(2). Finally, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that counsel appearing pro hac vice, pursuant to Section 6 of the Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing in Civil and Criminal Cases in the Western District of Texas, must register as a filing user within ten (10) days of this Order. Entered by Judge Richard B. Farrer. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (LR)
|
|
Filing 10
Pro Hac Vice Fee Paid Filing fee $ 100, receipt number 542. (mgr)
|
|
Filing 9
MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Elizabeth Murry.. Motions referred to Judge Richard B. Farrer. (mgr)
|
|
Filing 8
NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Ray R. Ortiz on behalf of ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY. Attorney Ray R. Ortiz added to party ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY(pty:dft) (Ortiz, Ray)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER REGARDING CERTAIN PRETRIAL MATTERS, ( Scheduling Recommendations/Proposed Scheduling Order due by 8/4/2022,, Initial Pretrial Conference set for 8/18/2022 10:30 AM before Judge Richard B. Farrer,). Signed by Judge Richard B. Farrer. (mgr)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER DENYING #5 Motion to Remand to State Court Signed by Judge Jason K. Pulliam. (mgr)
|
|
Filing 5
Agreed MOTION to Remand to State Court by ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Proposed Order). (Ortiz, Ray) Modified on 6/27/2022 to remove judge referral information(kc).
|
|
Filing 4
STANDING ORDER for procedure in cases before Judge Pulliam. All parties and counsel are directed to review Judge Pulliam's Standing Order containing rules of practice, particularly the requirement of conference before filing a Motion to Dismiss under Federal Rule 12(b)(6) and demonstration of complete diversity. Failure to follow these rules of practice could result in the Court striking the Motion to Dismiss on its own initiative without further notice. Signed by Judge Jason Pulliam.
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Richard B. Farrer. Signed by Judge Jason K. Pulliam. (nm)
|
|
Filing 2
Pro Hac Vice Letter to Attorney Jenna R. Cornejo regarding Attorney Admission to the Western District of Texas. (mgr)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Lucio ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY (Filing fee $402 receipt number 0542-16082358), filed by Lucio ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplement, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit C, #6 Exhibit D, #7 Exhibit E, #8 Exhibit F, #9 Exhibit G)(Ortiz, Ray)
|
|
Case assigned to Judge Jason K. Pulliam. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (mgr)
|
|
If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Farrer (mgr)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Murry v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Elizabeth Murry | |
| Represented By: | Jenna R. Cornejo |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY | |
| Represented By: | Edward J. Batis, Jr. |
| Represented By: | Jonathan W. Law |
| Represented By: | Ray R. Ortiz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
