Valdez v. Salazar, et al
| David D. Valdez, Javier Salazar, Sarah Clemens, Joseph Y. Stateson and Stephanie Boyd |
| 5:2022cv00600 |
| June 6, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Jason K Pulliam |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER Directing Monthly Payments be made from Prison Account of David D. Valdez,#500127, GRANTED IN PART #4 MOTION to Consolidate Cases filed by David D. Valdez, GRANTED #3 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by David D. Valdez., ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order as to David D. Valdez.. Signed by Judge Jason K. Pulliam. (nm)
|
| Copy of DE #5 mailed to Bexar County. Copy of DE #5 and blank 1983 form mailed to plaintiff. (nm) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Consolidate Cases by David D. Valdez. (nm) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis by David D. Valdez. (nm) |
| Filing 2 Case Opening Letter to David D. Valdez. (bt) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT, filed by David D. Valdez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Copy of envelope)(bt) |
| If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Farrer. (bt) |
| THIS CASE HAS BEEN RANDOMLY ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JASON K. PULLIAM. (bt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
