Copeland v. Jaddou et al
Latoya Copeland |
Ur M. Jaddou, David H. Wetmore and Jose M. Correa, Sr. |
5:2022cv01182 |
October 28, 2022 |
US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
Henry J Bemporad |
Xavier Rodriguez |
Other Immigration Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 USM-285, Summons and Copy of #3 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis, #4 Petition for Writ of Mandamus forwarded to USMS for service (mgr) |
Filing 4 Petition for Writ of Mandamus, filed by Latoya Copeland. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(mgr) |
Filing 3 ORDER GRANTING #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. It is FURTHER ORDERED, that, if not already provided, Plaintiff must submit a completed Summons in a Civil Action (AO 440) to the Clerk, which must include complete addresses for the Defendants required to be served. Signed by Judge Henry J. Bemporad. (mgr) |
Filing 2 Case Opening Letter to Latoya Copeland. (dtg) |
Filing 1 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis by Latoya Copeland. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Writ of Mandamus, #2 Civil Cover Sheet). Motions referred to Judge Henry J. Bemporad. (dtg) (Attachment 2 replaced on 10/28/2022) (dtg). |
CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Henry J. Bemporad. (dtg) |
THIS CASE HAS BEEN RANDOMLY ASSIGNED TO JUDGE XAVIER RODRIGUEZ. (dtg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.