Arcos et al v. State Farm Lloyds
Plaintiff: Brandon Lee Arcos and Kristen Aaron Arcos
Defendant: State Farm Lloyds
Case Number: 5:2022cv01199
Filed: November 2, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Texas
Presiding Judge: David A Ezra
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Petition for Removal-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 22, 2022 Filing 7 Proposed Scheduling Order by State Farm Lloyds. (Stephens, David)
December 22, 2022 Filing 6 Rule 26(f) Discovery Report/Case Management Plan by State Farm Lloyds. (Stephens, David)
December 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge David A. Ezra for all proceedings. Judge Orlando L. Garcia no longer assigned to case. Signed by Judge Orlando L. Garcia. (nm)
December 8, 2022 Filing 4 NON-CONSENT to Trial by US Magistrate Judge by State Farm Lloyds. (Stephens, David)
December 8, 2022 Filing 3 NON-CONSENT to Trial by US Magistrate Judge by Brandon Lee Arcos, Kristen Aaron Arcos. (Cabrera, Racchel)
November 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER AND ADVISORY--It is ORDERED that the Plaintiff(s) confer with the Defendant(s) as required by Fed.R.Civ.P 26(f) and Local Court Rule CV-16(c) to submit a proposed scheduling order for the Court's consideration within forty-five (45) days of the filing of this Order. So that this Court may more efficiently manage its docket, the parties are hereby ORDERED to notify the Court whether or not they consent to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction within thirty (30) days of the date of the filing of this Order. Signed by Chief Judge Orlando L. Garcia. (nm)
November 2, 2022 Case assigned to Chief Judge Orlando L. Garcia. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (nm)
November 2, 2022 If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Farrer (nm)
November 2, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by State Farm Lloyds (Filing fee $402 receipt number ATXWDC-16710385), filed by State Farm Lloyds. (Attachments: #1 Index of Matters Being Filed, #2 Exhibit Exh A, #3 Exhibit Exh B, #4 Exhibit Exh C, #5 Exhibit Exh D, #6 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #7 Supp Cov Sheet)(Stephens, David)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Arcos et al v. State Farm Lloyds
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brandon Lee Arcos
Represented By: Shaun W. Hodge
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kristen Aaron Arcos
Represented By: Shaun W. Hodge
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: State Farm Lloyds
Represented By: David R. Stephens
Represented By: Benjamin C. Nichols
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?