Scott Loftin v. Credit Human Federal Credit Union, et al
Scott Loftin |
Credit Human Federal Credit Union and Brent Irvin |
5:2022cv01343 |
December 15, 2022 |
US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
Xavier Rodriguez |
Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Scott Loftin as to Brent Irvin. Waiver sent on 12/19/2022, answer due 2/17/2023. (Fletcher, Melissa) |
Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Scott Loftin as to Credit Human Federal Credit Union. Waiver sent on 12/19/2022, answer due 2/17/2023. (Fletcher, Melissa) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Credit Human Federal Credit Union, Brent Irvin. (rg) |
If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Bemporad. (rg) |
Case assigned to Judge Xavier Rodriguez. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (rg) |
Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Scott Loftin. (Fletcher, Melissa) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXWDC-16869072), filed by Scott Loftin. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Fletcher, Melissa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.