Rodgers v. Mohamed et al
William Rodgers |
Abdifatah Abdullahi Mohamed, Contract Freighters, Inc. and United Services Automobile Association |
5:2023cv00094 |
January 25, 2023 |
US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
Jason K Pulliam |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 Agreed MOTION to Dismiss without Prejudice by William Rodgers. (Henry, Thomas) |
Filing 11 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE--Given the jurisdictional requirements of 1332, the Courts responsibility for determining the existence of subject matter jurisdiction, and the express direction of 28 U.S.C. 1447(c), the Court directs Defendants to show cause in writing on or before March 29, 2023, why the Court should not remand this action to state court. If any party intends to either move for remand or for dismissal of USAA, such party shall do so within that same deadline. Until this jurisdictional issue is resolved, the Court finds good cause to delay issuance of any scheduling order as to Contract Freighters, Inc., Abdifatah Abdullahi Mohamed, United Services Automobile Association. Show Cause Response due by 3/29/2023,. Signed by Judge Jason K. Pulliam. (nm) |
Filing 10 Defendant USAA's ANSWER to Complaint Notice of Removal. Attorney Daniel Coffey Andrews added to party United Services Automobile Association(pty:dft) by United Services Automobile Association.(Andrews, Daniel) |
Filing 9 STANDING ORDER for procedure in cases before Judge Pulliam. All parties and counsel are directed to review Judge Pulliam's Standing Order containing rules of practice, particularly the requirement of conference before filing a Motion to Dismiss under Federal Rule 12(b)(6) and demonstration of complete diversity. Failure to follow these rules of practice could result in the Court striking the Motion to Dismiss on its own initiative without further notice. Signed by Judge Jason Pulliam. (bot1) |
Case assigned to Judge Jason K. Pulliam. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (nm) |
If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Farrer (nm) |
Filing 8 SUPPLEMENT Notice to Court That All Removal Documents Were Served On All Parties/Counsel by Contract Freighters, Inc., Abdifatah Abdullahi Mohamed. (Warren, Larry) |
Filing 7 SUPPLEMENT Defendants' Jury Demand by Contract Freighters, Inc., Abdifatah Abdullahi Mohamed. (Warren, Larry) |
Filing 6 SUPPLEMENT Defendant's Original Answer by Contract Freighters, Inc., Abdifatah Abdullahi Mohamed. (Warren, Larry) |
Filing 5 SUPPLEMENT Certificate of Financially Interested Parties by Contract Freighters, Inc., Abdifatah Abdullahi Mohamed. (Warren, Larry) |
Filing 4 SUPPLEMENT List of All Counsel of Record by Contract Freighters, Inc., Abdifatah Abdullahi Mohamed. (Warren, Larry) |
Filing 3 SUPPLEMENT Brief in Support of Removal by Contract Freighters, Inc., Abdifatah Abdullahi Mohamed. (Warren, Larry) |
Filing 2 SUPPLEMENT Index of Matters Being Filed by Contract Freighters, Inc., Abdifatah Abdullahi Mohamed. (Warren, Larry) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Contract Freighters, Inc., Abdifatah Abdullahi Mohamed (Filing fee $402 receipt number BTXWDC-17009876), filed by Contract Freighters, Inc., Abdifatah Abdullahi Mohamed. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplement, #3 Exhibit A)(Warren, Larry) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.