Landy v. The United States of America
Plaintiff: Charlie V. Landy, Jr.
Defendant: The United States of America
Case Number: 5:2023cv00206
Filed: February 17, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Elizabeth S Chestney
Referring Judge: David A Ezra
2 Judge: Jason K Pulliam
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1346 Tort Claim
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 17, 2023 Filing 13 Summons Issued as to The United States of America. (mgr)
March 6, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER WITHDRAWING REFERRAL, CASE NO LONGER REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Elizabeth S. Chestney. Signed by Judge David A. Ezra. (mgr)
February 28, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 TRANSFER ORDER. Case reassigned to Judge David A. Ezra for all proceedings. Judge Jason K. Pulliam no longer assigned to case. Signed by Judge Jason K. Pulliam. (mgr)
February 24, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER CONDITIONALLY GRANTING #2 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order. Registration is managed by the PACER Service Center Signed by Judge Elizabeth S. Chestney. (mgr)
February 23, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Elizabeth S. Chestney. Signed by Judge Jason K. Pulliam.. Referral Magistrate Judge: Elizabeth S. Chestney. (mgr)
February 22, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 STANDING ORDER for procedure in cases before Judge Pulliam. All parties and counsel are directed to review Judge Pulliam's Standing Order containing rules of practice, particularly the requirement of conference before filing a Motion to Dismiss under Federal Rule 12(b)(6) and demonstration of complete diversity. Failure to follow these rules of practice could result in the Court striking the Motion to Dismiss on its own initiative without further notice. Signed by Judge Jason Pulliam. (bot1)
February 17, 2023 Filing 2 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Dorollo Nixon, Jr. ( Filing fee $100.00 receipt number 2003) by on behalf of Charlie V. Landy, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Filing Fee Receipt)(dtg)
February 17, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT (Filing fee $402.00 receipt number 2002), filed by Charlie V. Landy, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Filing Fee Receipt)(dtg)
February 17, 2023 If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Chestney. (dtg)
February 17, 2023 THIS CASE HAS BEEN RANDOMLY ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JASON K. PULLIAM. (dtg)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Landy v. The United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Charlie V. Landy, Jr.
Represented By: Dorollo Nixon, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?