Ramos v. Hunter Road CenterPoint Ltd
Robert Ramos |
Hunter Road CenterPoint Ltd |
5:2023cv00265 |
March 4, 2023 |
US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
Richard B Farrer |
Xavier Rodriguez |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 RESPONSE by Robert Ramos. (Strickland, Duncan) |
Filing 5 RESPONSE by Robert Ramos. (Strickland, Duncan) |
CASE NO LONGER REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Richard B. Farrer. (nm) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Robert Ramos (Strickland, Duncan) |
Filing 3 COMPLAINT, filed by Robert Ramos.(nm) (Main Document 3 replaced on 4/20/2023) (nm). |
Filing 2 ORDER CONDITIONALLY GRANTING #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Ramos is ORDERED to file a revised IFP application form within 21 days of this Order containing current explanations of any income and expenses. Ramos must personally fill out all answers and sign the form in ink. If Ramos is unable to do so, he must supplement his application with an explanation, as described above. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Ramoss Complaint shall be filed by the Clerk without prepayment of fees, costs, or the giving of security therefor, and the Clerk shall, until further Order of this Court, waive the collection of any other fees or costs from Ramos. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that service of Ramoss Complaint is STAYED until the Court receives and reviews Ramoss response to this Show Cause Order and orders service on Defendant. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within 21 days of this Order, Ramos shall amend his Complaint or otherwise show cause why this case should not be dismissed for lack of standing or for failure to state a non-frivolous claim upon which relief could be granted, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e). IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that Ramoss counsel shall SHOW CAUSE within 21 days of this Order why sanctions should not be assessed under Rule 11 or the Courts inherent powers. Signed by Judge Richard B. Farrer. (nm) |
Case assigned to Judge Xavier Rodriguez. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (nm) |
CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Richard B. Farrer.. Referral Judge: Richard B. Farrer. (nm) |
Filing 1 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis by Robert Ramos. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Complaint, #3 Exhibit CIP, #4 Proposed Order)(Strickland, Duncan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Ramos v. Hunter Road CenterPoint Ltd | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Robert Ramos | |
Represented By: | Duncan Harold Strickland |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Hunter Road CenterPoint Ltd | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.