Smith v. Bexar County et al
| Ronald Smith |
| Bexar County and Ramiro Sanchez |
| 5:2023cv00623 |
| May 15, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Henry J Bemporad |
| Jason K Pulliam |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal - 42:1983 Civil Rights |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
Memorandum in Support, filed by Bexar County, Ramiro Sanchez, re #9 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Defendant Bexar County, Defendant Ramiro Sanchez (Herrera, Jose)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER SETTING VIDEO INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE, (Video Initial Pretrial Conference set for 8/16/2023 1:30 PM before Judge Henry J. Bemporad,). Signed by Judge Henry J. Bemporad. (mgr)
|
|
Filing 10
Response in Opposition to Motion, filed by Ronald Smith, re #9 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Defendant Bexar County, Defendant Ramiro Sanchez Plaintiff's Response in Opposition to Defendants' 12(b)(6) Motion (Cano, Andres)
|
|
Filing 9
MOTION to Dismiss by Bexar County, Ramiro Sanchez. (Herrera, Jose)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER DENYING #6 Motion to Dismiss Signed by Judge Henry J. Bemporad. (mgr)
|
|
Filing 7
COMPLAINT Plaintiff's 1st Amended Original Complaint, filed by Ronald Smith.(Cano, Andres)
|
|
Filing 6
MOTION to Dismiss by Bexar County, Ramiro Sanchez. (Herrera, Jose)
|
|
Text Order GRANTING #2 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order. Registration is managed by the PACER Service Center entered by Judge Henry J. Bemporad. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (kmg)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Henry J. Bemporad. Signed by Judge Jason K. Pulliam.. Referral Magistrate Judge: Henry J. Bemporad. (mgr)
|
|
Filing 4
STANDING ORDER for procedure in cases before Judge Pulliam. All parties and counsel are directed to review Judge Pulliam's Standing Order containing rules of practice, particularly the requirement of conference before filing a Motion to Dismiss under Federal Rule 12(b)(6) and demonstration of complete diversity. Failure to follow these rules of practice could result in the Court striking the Motion to Dismiss on its own initiative without further notice. Signed by Judge Jason Pulliam. (bot1)
|
|
Filing 3
SUPPLEMENT to #1 Notice of Removal, by Bexar County, Ramiro Sanchez. (Herrera, Jose)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Andres Roberto Cano ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number ATXWDC-17443067) by on behalf of Ronald Smith. (Cano, Andres)
|
|
Case assigned to Judge Jason K. Pulliam. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (mgr)
|
|
If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Bemporad (mgr)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Bexar County, Ramiro Sanchez (Filing fee $402 receipt number BTXWDC-17437709), filed by Bexar County, Ramiro Sanchez. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State court docket sheet, #2 Exhibit State court original petition, #3 Exhibit State court Citation and service documents, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Herrera, Jose)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
