FILING ERROR
State of Texas |
Raul Salazar |
5:2023cv00692 |
May 26, 2023 |
US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
Assault Libel & Slander |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 Petition for Removal-Fed Employee/Scope of Employmt |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Raul Salazar (Filing fee $402), filed by Raul Salazar. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - State Court Pleadings, #2 Exhibit 2 - Certification, #3 Exhibit 3 - State Court Notices)(Dingivan, James) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: FILING ERROR | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: State of Texas | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Raul Salazar | |
Represented By: | James Edward Dingivan |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.