Beldon Roofing & Remodeling Co. v. Kent Consolidated Construction Inc. et al
| Beldon Roofing & Remodeling Co. |
| Kent Consolidated Construction Inc. and The Guarantee Company of North America USA |
| 5:2023cv00839 |
| July 6, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Fred Biery |
| Miller Act |
| 40 U.S.C. ยง 3131 Miller Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Beldon Roofing & Remodeling Co. as to The Guarantee Company of North America USA. Waiver sent on 7/28/2023, answer due 9/26/2023. (Serna, Elena) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Kent Consolidated Construction Inc., The Guarantee Company of North America USA. (nm) |
| If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Farrer (nm) |
| Case assigned to Judge Fred Biery. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (nm) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Beldon Roofing & Remodeling Co.. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(Serna, Elena) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXWDC-17624890), filed by Beldon Roofing & Remodeling Co.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Serna, Elena) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
