Casillas v. Lumpkin
Petitioner: Robert M. Casillas
Respondent: Director, TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Case Number: 5:2023cv00889
Filed: July 12, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Orlando L Garcia
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 9, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER GRANTING #6 Motion for Extension of Time to File. Petitioner may file his pro se 2254 petition (with no page limitation) on or before Thursday, November 9, 2023. Signed by Judge Orlando L. Garcia. (tm2)
August 4, 2023 Filing 6 PRO SE MOTION for Extension of Time to File by Robert M. Casillas. (nm)
July 27, 2023 Filing 5 ADVISORY TO THE COURT by Robert M. Casillas. (nm)
July 24, 2023 Copy of DE #4 , 2254 form, and blank 1983 form mailed to plaintiff. (nm)
July 21, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER DENYING #2 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Petitioner is warned that his current motion for counsel (ECF No. 2) and attached pleadings (ECF No. 1) are not construed as an application for habeas corpus relief filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254and have no effect on the limitations period imposed by 28 U.S.C. 2244(d) of the AEDPA. Should Petitioner choose to file a 2254 application for habeas corpus relief pro se, he may do so by clearly and concisely stating his allegations and relief sought on the forms provided within thirty (30) days of the filing of this Order. The Clerk of the Court shall forward to Petitioner the correct forms for filing a federal habeas application pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. If Petitioner chooses to file an application for writ of habeas corpus, he must either: (1) submit to the Court the required filing fee of $5.00 along with the 2254 application, or (2) file a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) along with a current institutional trust fund account statement showing deposits and balances to Petitioners institutional account for the previous six months. A trust fund account statement should be provided to Petitioner by the law library where Petitioner is incarcerated. The Clerk of the Court shall forward to Petitioner this Courts standard IFP application. Signed by Judge Orlando L. Garcia. (nm)
July 18, 2023 Filing 3 Case Opening Letter to Robert M. Casillas. (bt)
July 12, 2023 Filing 2 PRO SE MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Robert M. Casillas. (bt)
July 12, 2023 Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Robert M. Casillas. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Cover letter, #3 Copy of Envelope)(bt)
July 12, 2023 If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Farrer (bt)
July 12, 2023 THIS CASE HAS BEEN RANDOMLY ASSIGNED TO JUDGE ORLANDO L. GARCIA. (bt)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Casillas v. Lumpkin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Robert M. Casillas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Director, TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Represented By: Edward L. Marshall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?