Entxar Elloprop, LLC v. MidFirst Bank
Entxar Elloprop, LLC |
MidFirst Bank |
5:2023cv00957 |
August 3, 2023 |
US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
Fred Biery |
Richard B Farrer |
Real Property: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 RESPONSE to Motion, filed by MidFirst Bank, re #9 Opposed MOTION to Continue MIDFIRST BANK'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT filed by Plaintiff Entxar Elloprop, LLC (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Cronenwett, Mark) |
Filing 10 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Richard B. Farrer. Signed by Judge Fred Biery.. Referral Magistrate Judge: Richard B. Farrer. (wg) |
Filing 9 Opposed MOTION to Continue MIDFIRST BANK'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT by Entxar Elloprop, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Grubbs, Kenneth) |
Filing 8 MOTION for Summary Judgment and Brief in Support, by MidFirst Bank. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Proposed Order)(Cronenwett, Mark) |
Filing 7 RESPONSE to Motion, filed by MidFirst Bank, re #5 Unopposed MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Plaintiff Entxar Elloprop, LLC (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Proposed Order)(Cronenwett, Mark) |
Filing 6 NOTICE Notice of Service of Initial Disclosures, by MidFirst Bank (Cronenwett, Mark) |
Filing 5 Unopposed MOTION to Remand to State Court by Entxar Elloprop, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Deed of trust, #2 Exhibit Trustee's Deed Following Foreclosure)(Grubbs, Kenneth) |
Filing 4 COURT ADVISORY CONCERNING DISCOVERY AND OTHER MATTERS. Signed by Judge Fred Biery. (tm2) |
Filing 3 ORDER FOR SCHEDULING RECOMMENDATIONS AND ADVISORY CONCERNING ASSIGNMENT OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE-- IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties shall submit a proposed scheduling order to the Court within 60 days after any defendant has appeared.. Signed by Judge Fred Biery. (tm2) |
Case assigned to Judge Fred Biery. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (wg) |
If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Farrer (wg) |
Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Parties /Corporate Disclosure Statement by MidFirst Bank. (Cronenwett, Mark) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by MidFirst Bank (Filing fee $402 receipt number ATXWDC-17732632), filed by MidFirst Bank. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Supplement)(Cronenwett, Mark) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Entxar Elloprop, LLC v. MidFirst Bank | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Entxar Elloprop, LLC | |
Represented By: | Kenneth Ernest Grubbs |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: MidFirst Bank | |
Represented By: | Mark Douglas Cronenwett |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.