Camacho v. Smashtech, LLC
| Andrea Camacho |
| Smashtech, LLC |
| 5:2023cv01060 |
| August 25, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Elizabeth S Chestney |
| Jason K Pulliam |
| Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) |
| 47 U.S.C. ยง 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Text Order GRANTING #8 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply entered by Judge Elizabeth S. Chestney. Defendant Smashtech, LLC, has until October 30, 2023 to respond to Plaintiffs Complaint. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (hm)
|
| Filing 8 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Pleadings by Smashtech, LLC.. Motions referred to Judge Elizabeth S. Chestney. (Buyse, Brent) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Brent T. Buyse on behalf of Smashtech, LLC. Attorney Brent T. Buyse added to party Smashtech, LLC(pty:dft) (Buyse, Brent) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Andrea Camacho. Smashtech, LLC served on 9/8/2023, answer due 9/29/2023. (Hiraldo, Manuel) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Elizabeth S. Chestney. Signed by Judge Jason K. Pulliam. (nm)
|
|
Filing 4
STANDING ORDER for procedure in cases before Judge Pulliam. All parties and counsel are directed to review Judge Pulliam's Standing Order containing rules of practice, particularly the requirement of conference before filing a Motion to Dismiss under Federal Rule 12(b)(6) and demonstration of complete diversity. Failure to follow these rules of practice could result in the Court striking the Motion to Dismiss on its own initiative without further notice. Signed by Judge Jason Pulliam. (bot2)
|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Smashtech, LLC. (mgr) |
| Case assigned to Judge Jason K. Pulliam. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (mgr) |
| If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Chestney (mgr) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS by Andrea Camacho. (Hiraldo, Manuel) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXWDC-17811251), filed by Andrea Camacho. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit - Proposed Summons)(Hiraldo, Manuel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Camacho v. Smashtech, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Andrea Camacho | |
| Represented By: | Manuel S. Hiraldo |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Smashtech, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Brent T. Buyse |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
