Green v. Albright, et al.
| Lowell Green |
| Judge Alan D. Albright, et al. |
| 5:2023cv01066 |
| August 24, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Jason K Pulliam |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 COPY of Letter of transmittal from USCA to #518622, Mr. Lowell Green received for #6 Notice of Appeal, filed by Lowell Green.***We have docketed your appeal. You should use the number listed above on all future correspondence.*** (dtg) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEAL by Lowell Green. Per 5th Circuit rules, the appellant has 14 days, from the filing of the Notice of Appeal, to order the transcript. To order a transcript, the appellant should fill out a #(Transcript Order) and follow the instructions set out on the form. This form is available in the Clerk's Office or by clicking the hyperlink above.***NOTICE OF APPEAL FILED, PER 5TH CIRCUIT'S INSTRUCTIONS.*** (Attachments: #1 TRANSMITTAL LETTER FROM USCA5)(dtg) |
Filing 3
STANDING ORDER for procedure in cases before Judge Pulliam. All parties and counsel are directed to review Judge Pulliam's Standing Order containing rules of practice, particularly the requirement of conference before filing a Motion to Dismiss under Federal Rule 12(b)(6) and demonstration of complete diversity. Failure to follow these rules of practice could result in the Court striking the Motion to Dismiss on its own initiative without further notice. Signed by Judge Jason Pulliam. (bot1)
|
|
Filing 5
FINAL JUDGMENT-- IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff Lowell Q. Greens presumed request to proceed IFP is DENIED and his 42 U.S.C. 1983 Civil Rights Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to the threestrikes dismissal rule of 28 U.S.C. 1915(g).. Signed by Judge Jason K. Pulliam. (tm2)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER OF DISMISSAL-- IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Greens presumed request to proceed IFP is DENIED and his 42 U.S.C. 1983 Civil Rights Complaint (ECF No. 1) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to the threestrikes dismissal rule of 28 U.S.C. 1915(g).. Signed by Judge Jason K. Pulliam. (tm2) ).
|
| Filing 2 Case Opening Letter to Lowell Green. (vl) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT, filed by Lowell Green. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Copy of Envelope)(vl) |
| If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Farrer. (vl) |
| THIS CASE HAS BEEN RANDOMLY ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JASON K. PULLIAM. (vl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Green v. Albright, et al. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Lowell Green | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Judge Alan D. Albright, et al. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
