Flores v. HEB
Eli Flores |
HEB |
5:2023cv01430 |
November 13, 2023 |
US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
Elizabeth S Chestney |
Jason K Pulliam |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal - Discrimination |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 10, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 SCHEDULING ORDER: ADR Mediation Completed by 8/30/2024, Amended Pleadings due by 3/5/2024, Discovery due by 7/5/2024, Motions due by 8/30/2024,. Signed by Judge Elizabeth S. Chestney. (mgr) |
Filing 15 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Elizabeth S. Chestney: Initial Pretrial Conference held on 1/10/2024. (Court Reporter FTR Gold.)(mgr) |
Text Order MOOTING #11 PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN for the reasons stated on the record during the Initial Pretrial Conference today, January 10, 2024. All case management matters were addressed at the conference, at which both parties appeared. Entered by Judge Elizabeth S. Chestney. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ESC) |
Text Order GRANTING #13 DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE ITS REPLY TO PLAINTIFFS RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION. Defendant shall file its reply on or before January 16, 2024. Entered by Judge Elizabeth S. Chestney. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ESC) |
Text Order MOOTING #14 DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE ITS RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO COMPEL JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLANS, as Plaintiff's motion has been dismissed as moot by the Court. Entered by Judge Elizabeth S. Chestney. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ESC) |
Filing 14 Opposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Joint Case Management Plans by HEB.. Motions referred to Judge Elizabeth S. Chestney. (Good, Alexander) |
Filing 13 Opposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Plaintiff's Response in Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Compel Arbitration by HEB.. Motions referred to Judge Elizabeth S. Chestney. (Good, Alexander) |
Filing 10 Rule 26(f) Discovery Report/Case Management Plan by HEB. (Good, Alexander) |
Filing 9 Scheduling Recommendations by HEB. (Good, Alexander) |
Filing 12 Response in Opposition to Motion, filed by Eli Flores, re #7 MOTION to Compel Arbitration of Plaintiff's Claims and Motion to Dismiss, or in the alternative, Stay Litigation filed by Defendant HEB (mgr) |
Filing 11 MOTION TO COMPEL JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLANS by Eli Flores.. Motions referred to Judge Elizabeth S. Chestney. (mgr) |
Filing 8 Joint Fed. R. Civ.P.26 Report by Eli Flores, HEB (mgr) |
Filing 7 MOTION to Compel Arbitration of Plaintiff's Claims and Motion to Dismiss, or in the alternative, Stay Litigation by HEB. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Proposed Order). Motions referred to Judge Elizabeth S. Chestney. (Good, Alexander) |
Filing 6 ORDER SETTING INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE ( Scheduling Recommendations/Proposed Scheduling Order due by 1/5/2024,, Pretrial Conference set for 1/10/2024 2:30 PM before Judge Elizabeth S. Chestney,). Signed by Judge Elizabeth S. Chestney. (mgr) |
Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint by HEB.(Smith, Lawrence) |
Filing 4 SUPPLEMENT to #1 Notice of Removal by HEB. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Smith, Lawrence) |
Filing 3 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Elizabeth S. Chestney fordisposition of all non-dispositive pretrial matters. Signed by Judge Jason K. Pulliam. (slt) |
Filing 2 STANDING ORDER for procedure in cases before Judge Pulliam. All parties and counsel are directed to review Judge Pulliam's Standing Order containing rules of practice, particularly the requirement of conference before filing a Motion to Dismiss under Federal Rule 12(b)(6) and demonstration of complete diversity. Failure to follow these rules of practice could result in the Court striking the Motion to Dismiss on its own initiative without further notice. Signed by Judge Jason Pulliam. (bot1) |
Case assigned to Judge Jason K. Pulliam. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (bt) |
If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Chestney (bt) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by HEB (Filing fee $402 receipt number ATXWDC-18090473), filed by HEB. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Supplement JS 44)(Smith, Lawrence) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Flores v. HEB | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Eli Flores | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: HEB | |
Represented By: | Alexander Good |
Represented By: | Lawrence D. Smith |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.