Diale v. State of Virginia et al
Amber Marie Diale |
State of Virginia, State of North Carolina, State of Michigan, State of Colorado, State of Missouri, State of Rhode Island, United States Navy, United States Army, State of Texas and State of Maryland |
5:2024cv00013 |
January 4, 2024 |
US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
Henry J Bemporad |
Elizabeth S Chestney |
Jason K Pulliam |
Other Statutory Actions |
25 U.S.C. § 1901 Indian Child Welfare Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
Filing 8 PRO-SE MOTION to Withdraw #5 Complaint by Amber Marie Diale.***Possible duplicate filing of document #7 ***. Motions referred to Judge Henry J. Bemporad. (bt) |
Filing 7 PRO-SE NOTICE & MOTION to Withdraw/Amend #5 Complaint by Amber Marie Diale.. Motions referred to Judge Henry J. Bemporad. (wg) |
|
Filing 5 COMPLAINT, filed by Amber Marie Diale. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(bt) |
|
|
|
Filing 2 Case Opening Letter to Amber Marie Diale. (dtg) |
Filing 1 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis by Amber Marie Diale. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet). Motions referred to Judge Elizabeth S. Chestney. (dtg) |
CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Elizabeth S. Chestney. (dtg) |
THIS CASE HAS BEEN RANDOMLY ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JASON K. PULLIAM. (dtg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.