Jarmon v. Core Health Medical Provider et al
| Ersala Jarmon |
| Core Health Medical Provider, Comal County Jail and Sheriff Mark Reynolds |
| 5:2024cv00051 |
| January 10, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Jason K Pulliam |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
STANDING ORDER for procedure in cases before Judge Pulliam. All parties and counsel are directed to review Judge Pulliam's Standing Order containing rules of practice, particularly the requirement of conference before filing a Motion to Dismiss under Federal Rule 12(b)(6) and demonstration of complete diversity. Failure to follow these rules of practice could result in the Court striking the Motion to Dismiss on its own initiative without further notice. Signed by Judge Jason Pulliam. (bot2)
|
| Filing 3 Case Opening Letter to Ersala Jarmon. (vl) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis by Ersala Jarmon. (vl) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT, filed by Ersala Jarmon. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Copy of Envelope) (vl). |
| If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Bemporad. (vl) |
| THIS CASE HAS BEEN RANDOMLY ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JASON K. PULLIAM. (vl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
