MacWilliams v. Cooke et al
Jessie MacWilliams |
Officer FNU Cooke, S.E.R.T. Officer FNU Rios and Officer on 3rd Shift |
5:2024cv00121 |
February 1, 2024 |
US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
Orlando L Garcia |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 6, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 JUDGMENT--IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff Jessie MacWilliam's Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis is DENIED and his 42 U.S.C. 1983 Civil Rights Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to the three strikes dismissal rule of 1915(g). Signed by Judge Orlando L. Garcia. (bt) |
Filing 4 ORDER DISMISSING CASE--IT IS THEFORE ORDERED that MacWilliam's Application to Proceed IFP is DENIED and his 42 U.S.C. 1983 Civil Rights Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to the three-strikes dismissal rule of 1915(g). Signed by Judge Orlando L. Garcia. (bt) |
Filing 3 Case Opening Letter to Jessie MacWilliams. (vl) |
Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jessie MacWilliams. (vl) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT, filed by Jessie MacWilliams. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Copy of Envelope)(vl) |
If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Chestney. (vl) |
THIS CASE HAS BEEN RANDOMLY ASSIGNED TO JUDGE ORLANDO L. GARCIA. (vl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.