Francois v. Salazar et al
Jamal Francois |
Sheriff Javier Salazard, DA Joe Gonzalez, Ron Ross, Sheriff Javier Salazar and DA Joe Gonzales |
5:2024cv00126 |
February 5, 2024 |
US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
Xavier Rodriguez |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE-- IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order, Francois must show cause why his 1983 Complaint (ECF No. 1) should not be dismissed, in whole or in part, by filing an amended complaint correcting the deficiencies set out in this Show Cause Order. Signed by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. (bt) |
Mailed a copy of Order #5 and a blank copy of a 1983 Complaint to the Plaintiff. (bt) |
Filing 4 ORDER Directing Monthly Payments be made from Prison Account of Jamal Francois, SID #1140744. Signed by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. (mgr) |
Filing 3 Case Opening Letter to Jamal Francois. (vl) |
Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jamal Francois. (vl) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT, filed by Jamal Francois. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Copy of Envelope)(vl) |
If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Bemporad. (vl) |
THIS CASE HAS BEEN RANDOMLY ASSIGNED TO JUDGE XAVIER RODRIGUEZ. (vl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.