Rosas v. Boosifier Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Francisco Rosas
Defendant: Boosifier Inc. doing business as Pridestaff and President Therese Calderon
Case Number: 5:2024cv00224
Filed: March 1, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Elizabeth S Chestney
Referring Judge: Xavier Rodriguez
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 8, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for #5 Report and Recommendations, DENIED #1 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Francisco Rosas. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that within thirty days (30) from the date of this Order, Rosas shall either pay the filing fee and administrative fee or face dismissal of his proposed Complaint for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with this Order. See FED. R. CIV. P. 41(b).The Clerk is DIRECTED to mail a copy of this Order to Francisco Rosas at 5418 King Richard St., San Antonio, Texas 78229. Signed by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. (wg)
March 18, 2024 Filing 8 Certified mail acknowledgment receipt for magistrate report and recommendations re #5 Report and Recommendations as to Francisco Rosas. (rqr)
March 12, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER RETURNING CASE TO DISTRICT COURT, CASE NO LONGER REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Elizabeth S. Chestney. Signed by Judge Elizabeth S. Chestney. (rqr)
March 12, 2024 Filing 6 Certified Mail Receipt of #5 Report and Recommendations (rqr)
March 12, 2024 Filing 5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #1 Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Francisco Rosas. Signed by Judge Elizabeth S. Chestney. (rqr)
March 4, 2024 Filing 4 Case Opening Letter to Francisco Rosas. (vl)
March 1, 2024 Filing 3 Pro Se MOTION for Permission to file Electronically by Francisco Rosas.. Motions referred to Judge Elizabeth S. Chestney. (vl)
March 1, 2024 Filing 2 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Francisco Rosas.. Motions referred to Judge Elizabeth S. Chestney. (vl)
March 1, 2024 Filing 1 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis by Francisco Rosas. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed USM 285 Form). Motions referred to Judge Elizabeth S. Chestney. (vl) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/4/2024: #4 Copy of Envelope) (vl).
March 1, 2024 CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Elizabeth S. Chestney. (vl)
March 1, 2024 THIS CASE HAS BEEN RANDOMLY ASSIGNED TO JUDGE XAVIER RODRIGUEZ. (vl)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rosas v. Boosifier Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Francisco Rosas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Boosifier Inc. doing business as Pridestaff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: President Therese Calderon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?