Hall v. Walmart Inc. et al
| Amalia Hall |
| Walmart Inc. and Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC |
| 5:2024cv00357 |
| April 9, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Xavier Rodriguez |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 23, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 Rule 26(f) Discovery Report/Case Management Plan PLAINTIFFS INITIAL RULE 26(a)(1) DISCLOSURE by Amalia Hall. (Salcedo, Fernando) |
Filing 12
ORDER SETTING STATUS CONFERENCEAND HEARING ON ALL PENDING MOTIONS, (Status Conference set for 6/25/2024 10:30 AM before Judge Xavier Rodriguez,). Signed by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. (vl)
|
|
Filing 11
SCHEDULING ORDER: Final Pretrial Conference set for 9/11/2025 10:30 AM before Judge Xavier Rodriguez, Jury Selection & Jury Trial set for 9/22/2025 9:00 AM before Judge Xavier Rodriguez, ADR Report Deadline due by 3/21/2025, ADR Mediation Completed by 3/21/2025, Amended Pleadings due by 8/30/2024, Discovery due by 3/10/2025, Motions due by 4/11/2025,. Signed by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. (vl)
|
| Filing 10 Scheduling Recommendations AGREED SCHEDULING RECOMMENDATIONS by Amalia Hall. (Salcedo, Fernando) |
| Filing 9 Rule 26(f) Discovery Report/Case Management Plan JOINT FED. R. CIV. P. 26 REPORT by Amalia Hall. (Salcedo, Fernando) |
| Filing 8 Final MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Fernando Salcedo with Order ( Filing fee $ 100 receipt number ATXWDC-18712661) by on behalf of Amalia Hall. (Salcedo, Fernando) |
|
Text Order GRANTING #8 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice entered by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. Pursuant to our Administrative Policies and Procedures for Electronic Filing, the attorney hereby granted permission to practice pro hac vice in this case must register for electronic filing with our court within 10 days of this order. Registration is managed by the PACER Service Center. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (dllc)
|
| Filing 7 SUPPLEMENT to #1 Notice of Removal, by Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC, Walmart Inc.. (Floyd, James) |
| Filing 6 ADVISORY TO THE COURT by Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC, Walmart Inc. . (Floyd, James) |
| Filing 5 NON-CONSENT to Trial by US Magistrate Judge by Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC, Walmart Inc.. (Floyd, James) |
|
Filing 4
Order for Scheduling Recommendations/Proposed Scheduling Order. ( Scheduling Recommendations/Proposed Scheduling Order due by 5/10/2024,), Notice of right to consent to disposition of a civil case by a U.S. Magistrate Judge.Signed by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. (wg)
|
|
Filing 3
STANDING ORDER CONCERNING REMOVED CASES. Signed by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. (wg)
|
| Filing 2 Pro Hac Vice Letter to Plaintiff's attorney Fernando Saucedo. (wg) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC, Walmart Inc. (Filing fee $405 receipt number ATXWDC-18624954), filed by Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC, Walmart Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibits A - H, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Supplement Supplement to JS 44)(Floyd, James) |
| Case assigned to Judge Xavier Rodriguez. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (wg) |
| If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Bemporad (wg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
