Evans v. Supreme Court of New York, Trial Division, Criminal Term, for the City of Manhattan, New York et al
| Treniss J. Evans |
| Supreme Court of New York, Trial Division, Criminal Term, for the City of Manhattan, New York and Alvin Bragg |
| IN RE: Petitioner Treniss Evans |
| 5:2024cv00480 |
| May 10, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Jason K Pulliam |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
Case Opening Letter to Treniss J. Evans. (dtg)
|
|
Filing 2
Summons Issued as to Alvin Bragg, District Attorney for Manahattan, New York and Supreme Court of New York, Trial Division, Criminal Term, for the City of Manhattan, New York. (dtg)
|
|
Filing 1
Petition for Writ of Prohibition (Filing fee $405.00; receipt number 4958), filed by Treniss J. Evans. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Filing Fee Receipt)(dtg)***Modified TEXT TO REFLECT THAT THE FILING IS A PETITION FOR WRIT OF PROHIBITION AND NOT A PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS on 5/10/2024 (dtg).***
|
|
If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Chestney. (dtg)
|
|
THIS CASE HAS BEEN RANDOMLY ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JASON K. PULLIAM. (dtg)
|
|
EMERGENCY EXPEDITED SCHEDULING REQUESTED by Treniss J. Evans.***THE EMERGENCY EXPEDITE SCHEDULING REQUESTED IS INCLUDED IN DOCKET ENTRY #1 .*** (dtg)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
