Trejo v. Biden et al
Mr. Anthony R. Trejo |
Dr. Victoria Trickett, U.S. President Joe Biden, U.S. Vice President, RN FNU Pabola, PNA Matthew LNU, PNA "Ross", RN Ms. Abby, RN Crystal LNU, PNA David LNU, Medical Supervisor Whitney Walker, Bexar County Sheriff Javier Salazar, Texas Governor Greg Abbott, RN JANE DOE, SASH Psychiatrist Patricia M., RN John Doe, John/Jane Does, Ms. Alla, Social Worker Daniel Uresti, Superintendent Robert C. Arizpe, PNA Joe Sanchez, Occupational Therapy Mary Rose LNU, PNA Enrique LNU, RN Mercedez LNU, John/Jane Doe and RN Nan LNU |
5:2024cv00496 |
May 15, 2024 |
US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
Xavier Rodriguez |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 10, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE--IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order, Trejo must show cause why his Complaint should not be dismissed by filing an amended complaint curing the deficiencies set out in this Show Cause Order. Signed by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. (bt) |
Mailed a copy of Order #12 and a blank copy of a 1983 to Plaintiff (bt) |
Filing 11 ORDER REOPENING CASE, Motions terminated: ORDER GRANTING #10 MOTION for Leave to File Motion to Reinstate filed by Anthony R. Trejo--IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Trejos motion to reinstate (ECF No. 10) is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is directed to reinstate Trejos 1983 suit and reopen this matter. It is so ORDERED. Signed by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. (bt) |
Filing 10 Pro-Se MOTION to Reinstate by Anthony R. Trejo. (bt) Modified on 6/28/2024, to edit text (bt). |
Filing 9 Filing fee received in the amount of $405, receipt number 5274 (bt) |
Text Order DISMISSING WITHOUT PREJUDICE AS MOOT #8 Motion to Appoint Counsel entered by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. The Court dismissed this case on May 17, 2024. Therefore, Plaintiff's motion for appointed counsel is moot. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ks1) |
Filing 8 PRO-SE MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Anthony R. Trejo. (bt) |
Filing 7 ORDER DENYING #6 Motion for Reconsideration re #6 MOTION for Reconsideration re #5 Judgment, #4 Order Dismissing Case, filed by Anthony R. Trejo Signed by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. (mgr) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Reconsideration re #5 Judgment, #4 Order Dismissing Case, by Anthony R. Trejo. (mgr) |
Filing 5 FINAL JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. (mgr) |
Filing 4 ORDER OF DISMISSAL --IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Trejos Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis(ECF No. 2) is DENIED, and his Complaint (ECF No. 1) is DISMISSED WITHOUT 4PREJUDICE pursuant to the threestrikes dismissal rule of 1915(g). Trejo is advised that his Complaint may be reinstated only if the full filing fee is paid simultaneously with the filing of a motion to reinstate within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order.. Signed by Judge Xavier Rodriguez. (mgr) |
Filing 3 Case Opening Letter to Anthony R. Trejo. (vl) |
Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis by Anthony R. Trejo. (vl) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT, filed by Anthony R. Trejo. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Copy of Envelope)(vl) |
If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Bemporad. (vl) |
THIS CASE HAS BEEN RANDOMLY ASSIGNED TO JUDGE XAVIER RODRIGUEZ. (vl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.